Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Libfas, please explain your ethics

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-14 14:06

1.  Why is it wrong to kill a violent criminal but okay to kill an innocent fetus?  I'm not particularly opposed to abortions, but it makes no sense that you rail against capital punishment while endorsing abortion.

2.  Why do you despise Christianity but tell everyone else that their religions are beautiful and are to be respected?  I don't understand how you can extol the greatness of science and education while while telling everyone (other than Christians) that their baseless beliefs should be protected.  I'm generally opposed to religion, so I say if you're going to hate one of them, hate all of them.

3.  Why is it wrong from conservatives to go on fear mongering about terrorism but it's okay for you to tell everyone the world is going to end because of global warming?  Whether or not you believe in either of these supposed threats it's clear that both sides are using fear to manipulate people.  Why not take the higher road if you're so educated and ethical?

4.  Why do you like Mac so much?

5.  Why do you believe the federal government can fix all of society's ills when it can barely deliver the mail?  It has been proven throughout history that large central governments lead to corruption and abuse.  Why do you continue to support big government?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-18 15:55

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-18 20:05

Liberal, athiest, moral absolutist checking in from the high ground.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 0:11

>>281
nope thats not proof try again.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 4:54

Kill both. If it is a liability, and a economic drain, kill the fucker. Only contributing members of society should experience life.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 10:16

>>284
Contributing to who?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 11:30

>>281
That doesn't prove anything. That just suggests that different people have different moral reasoning, which was always the case throughout human history.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 22:17

If a fetus isn't a human being, then neither is a negro.

Discuss.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-20 0:52

>>281
>>287
281, that is a total misinterpretation. We live by our own morals, simply to live happier, longer lives. We declare that morals are relative but that doesn't mean we don't have any.
287, this is an example of illogical comparison. Arguments through comparison are invalid, as one thing is not another. A point proven through comparison is a point proven through ignorance of difference.
You are, actually, both guilty of illogical comparison.
281:
Relativism ≠ Immoral
287:
Fetus ≠ African American
And also:
Using the term "Negro" = Racist

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-20 1:32

>>288
A word can not be racist because it has no feelings and, furthermore, does not mean anyone harm.  The context of the sentence in which the word is used, on the other hand, can be considered racist, which implicates that word with the same context, when in reality we should be shunning the speaker and not the sentence.  So, calling "negro" a racist word is being doubly evasive, ignoring where the real blame should be placed.
Nigger.

>>285
Contributing to whom?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-20 5:51

>>288
nignog ALERT: #"CODE RED"

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-20 20:51

fetus > nigger

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-21 2:03

>>289
Sure, in the context of posting it on a bulletin board, it's not causing anyone any immediate harm, but you're being deliberately obtuse and using faulty reasoning as an excuse to mindlessly write the word out of some strange gratification you receive from the posting of it. It's like an alcoholic or drug addict saying "Hey! I'm not causing anyone any immediate harm to anyone else! So why bother ceasing?".

>>290
Just because you can do fancy BBCODE, #does not mean that you actually belong here on world4ch.

Go back to /b/, or /int/, as it's become a pseudo /new/ already.

>>291
http://boards.4chan.org/b/

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-21 4:33

>>290,291
Back to /prog/, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-21 15:17

>>293
No. /prog/ doesn't need more shitposters.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 11:07

>>292,293
Consider this: A pack of wild Niggers.
Savage, slavering Niggers nearing your white home. Trampling your white lawn. Raping your white daughter.
And you can't do shit since they're savages. The Nigger leader grabs your wife and fucks her with his shaman stick.
The primal Niggers finally dominate your household. They watch barbaric shows on TV and you are forced to be their slave.
Such is the downfall of White Man.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 18:01

>>295
I'd call this equal opportunities...

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 18:07

>>295
Substitute:
Nigers->israeli settlers
White->Palestinian
Shaman stick->Assault riffle
Barbaric shows->Family guy

Welcome to gaza...

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 18:19

>>297
Family guy is a barbaric show

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-23 17:11

re. OP point no. 2, other religions have never tried to shove it down my throat and tell me I'm going to burn for all eternity

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-23 18:19

300 GET

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 8:52

>>295
Sounds like you're projecting a sexual fantasy of yours. My advice: Seek professional help.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 11:15

>>295
I'll be your nigger if you be the white man.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 12:42

>>302
I'll be the nigger, I enjoy being whipped.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 15:40

>>302-303
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 5:43

>>304
Is it a crime to enjoy gay bondage with muscular black men? Racist.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-27 0:41

>>305

do they have to be black men?  being bi, i'll go for a Nubian princess(bondage is a must)...   but with men, yeah whites only...

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-27 23:13

I thought Liberals liked Christianity.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 11:56

>>305-306
Sounds pretty queer!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 20:36

>>307
It's a paradox.  Postmodern "Liberalism" and Classical Christianity are both anarchistic, pacifistic, nihilistic, antinomian creeds that declare the existing order corrupt and contemptible.  Christians ignored the material world and sat back and did nothing as Rome fell; modern "Progressives" trip over their own feet running to open the gates for the barbarians.  In the end both roads lead to the same place:  dust and darkness.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-28 23:13

>>309
And yet modern "liberals" hate Christianity, because it has become part of the tradition of Western Civilization, a tradition they loathe and want to expunge.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-27 21:53

>>309
That's where everything ends, bro. Doesn't matter what you do, it all has to fall.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-27 23:09

>>311
...and then we can rebuild!
Bring it all down, man!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-28 2:20

>>311
>>312
"Progressives" trip over their own feet running to open the gates for the barbarians.
Case in point.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-18 9:14

I RED AYN AND AND I HAZ NO OBLIGATION TO DO ANYTHING K

Fair enough man. Go live on your own independent of any mutual relation and see how that works out for you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-19 12:34

>>314
Who are you talking to?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-19 21:24

>4.  Why do you like Mac so much?

It's they gay computer of course.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 22:02

1. Because a fetus is not a living being. It is a mass of cells with no thought. And yes, we can prove that. Get your fucking religious bullshit out of government, you conservatives have lower average IQs than liberals, and Atheists have higher average IQs than people of any religion. You are not intelligent enough to speak on this subject, please go back to binge drinking and beating your wife and be sure to attend church on Sunday so you can justify your actions by asking your imaginary friend for forgiveness.

2. Maybe it's because Christians were burning other religions and atheists at the stake for hundreds of years, and still discriminate against them today? Or maybe it's because Christians are still favored by the government charity-wise, their shitty dark-age morals still influence government (lololol no gays no sex until marriage no abortion), they generally won't shut the fuck up, and are immune to logic and reason?It's the affirmative action of religion.

3. Because we don't need to strip everyone of their rights in order to stop global warming, nor will taking steps to stop it result in government having the power to declare anyone they don't like a terrorist, stripping them of all rights and allowing them to be abused/silenced.

4. Only hipster faggots.

5. Yeah and historically democracies always descended to Tyranny in time. We'd be able to fix the inefficiency of the government if the Conservatives weren't so obsessed with providing 'jobs' to everyone, even when ridiculous job security backfires.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-22 0:59

>>317
1 KILLING BABIES IS COOL! Atheists durr R smart!
Nice, a baby killer that hates Christains and who seems extra butthurt about it.

2 Religion is EVILLLLL!!!
Godless Communists killed more. LOL.

>3 global warming hate freedom or something
Lefties love liberty until they find out you can vote against them or you might disagree with them.
 
>4 Gays are coooool

>5 Conservatives bad cuz that want us to have jobs or something.
You lost me with this one. When have Conservatives stopped anyone from making things more efficient. Obama's 2000 page health care reform says you have a very warped idea of inefficiency.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-30 14:24

>a fetus is not a living being. It is a mass of cells with no thought. And yes, we can prove that

You just described lieberals.

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-01 15:48

>>318

implying you understood anything >>317 said

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List