The Invisible Hand should stop jackin' it

There's ZERO reason to think that one man should earn the sum of what 20,000 people earn.  Government, which represents its citizens, can help with rational safety nets and income redistribution.  It's too bad the Republicunts love to exploit people's morals.  It was alcohol in the early 1900s.  Race in the 1950s and not its gays.

ALSO Ron Paul is retarded.

>>37

yeah but someone earning $20,000 a year is literally spending all their money on food, rent, etc.. so they're being taxed on 100% of their income where as someone earning $150,000 might only spend half of that so they're only being taxed on 50% of their income.

As for untaxed mortgages, it's pretty funny you'd mention that as someone earning $20,000 is never going to buy a house.