Spic thread

I'm an American with Mexican heritage.  My family never emigrated to the US, instead the US came to us during the Mexican American war.  I'm patriotic, educated and proud to say both my grandparents fought in WWII.  In my family there are doctors, scientists and lawyers.  I speak English and Spanish and I currently attend a top 15 university.

I believe phrenology is a pseudo-science I fully discard the notion that intelligence is somehow tied to genetics.  The authors of The Bell Curve went through contortions to prop that argument up and it can be critically refuted on any number of points, not the least of which the ridiculous notion that there can be a crude numerical representation of intelligence.  And if you must know, I scored in the 99th percentile on the SATs.

So after having said all this, I ask why is it that the stormfront faggos continue to set true meritocracy aside and focus on the crudest of measurements in defining the superiority of certain races?  IQ tests?  Please, who gives a shit if someone in the Congo doesn't want to finish the wavy lined pattern test.  As far as culture, it seems foolish to make any definite pronouncements with only the barest of impressions that we have of human history.  Technology changes in the blink of an eye, if a modern person could be transported back 150 years ago, they would scoff at the "mighty" British empire.

So why do the storm faggos think they're superior.  Crime?  It's much lower today than it was 150 years ago in Europe.  Appearance?  It's subjective and the truth is most white women are plain-janes just like any other race.  Heritage?  It's a meaningless concept, especially if your just a fat neckbeard not pulling your weight.  Culture?  lol.

The best I can tell, the only reason for people to be racist is that they've set up a comfort zone that they're unwilling to leave.  It's a passive agressive form a xenophobia.  They're like old men but still in their 20s.

>>1
You're probably a high-caste Mexican whose ancestors didn't intermarry much with the native Indian populous. In countries where race is mixed, like Argentina, the lighter skinned people with the largest amount of European heritage always rise to the top. However, from reading your post you are certainly no intellectual, and bragging about your supposed intelligence won't win a debate. At best it might convince a foolish spectator like >>6 that you know what you're talking about.

I have to agree with you about IQ tests; they really don't tell the whole picture. For example, Asians score higher than Whites on the tests but their contributions to the advancement of society (science, arts, philosophy, literature, etc.) are very weak. Similarly, you score in the 99th percentile and can't even put a logical argument together. I think creative genius is a quality which is a lot harder to measure. You "discard" (read: deny) the notion that intelligence is somehow tied to genetics, but no offer no evidence to back this up. This sounds a lot worse than Murray and Herrnstein's "pseudo-scientific" methods, more like blind faith. Scholars in the field of IQ testing have proven about 75% of IQ test score differences to be hereditary (down to genetics). Why, also, do you cite your high SAT score (which is a ranking of people in a liner order of ability) to try and add credibility to your argument, but then disregard IQ because it measures people in a linear order? No scholar that works with IQ tests claim that they are infallible; they are however the best model we have for trying to measure the human invented concept of "intelligence". They are an incredibly accurate predictor of success (more than socioeconomic status - proven in The Bell Curve) and correlate strongly with all things we would expect "intelligence" to.

Your point about "going back in history and laughing at the British Empire" is so pathetic and flawed; I don't even know where to start. I'll just leave you try and figure out why it's such a terrible argument. As for appearance, there are studies that have shown even black children are more attracted to the looks of white children, but I accept it's subjective and some people might actually choose 100% pure dark skinned Africans over white women or racially mixed blacks. Consider also that the rate of black on white rape is about a HUNDRED times higher than the rate of white on black rape.

Finally, you say heritage doesn't matter, but also claim to be a proud American and seem to be proud of the professions of your family? You say "lol" at White culture, but it was your family who obviously wanted to be part of our culture since you moved to America. You know Whites built America right? Capitalism, the industrial revolution, technology, the American constitution, democracy, universities, and just about fucking everything else is White culture. Do you think having a liking for tacos constitutes a culture? That's nothing more than a trivial food preference; Whites are the masters of culture.

It's not even up for debate the fact that Whites have been the most successful people on the planet, despite being heavily outnumbered by other races on the planet. Of course individuals from other groups can do well, like your family (whom I commend for being patriots, by the way), but they don't represent the overall picture. It's just that some Whites don't want to see the countries that they built and live in get turned into third world gang warzones (like what has happened to LA, Detroit, Washington), or see their own people pushed out of jobs because of Affirmative Action. Some people just want to live around other Whites, that's it. I, myself have appreciation for some people of other races and countries, but I want to remain separate and around my own people if possible.