Hiroshima and Nagasaki

With the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the U.S. DIRECTLY targeted civilians.  They also directly targeted civilians with the firebombing of Tokyo and Dresden.  The Japanese and German GOVERNMENTS committed many atrocities, but that in no way makes it moral or right for the U.S. to murder civilians in those countries.

You can make all the arguments you want about how murdering these civilians brought an early end to the war.  This does not change the fact that civilian men, women, and children were murdered.  When other people do this, we call them terrorists.  That label applies equally here.

>>49

There are plenty of fucking reasons, but whatever, I'm not going to argue that with you here.

You can't actually argue since you don't actually have reasons to support.  There is no serious reason to doubt bin Laden was the architect of 911.  That's the truth that is well enough documented in the 911 Report, and until you come up with the (admittedly non-existent) facts to counter it, IT STANDS.

Anyway, what a choice you give them, eh? A choice between Moral Relativism and Childish 'tit-for-tat' Ignorance.

No, it's a clear choice between accepting or denouncing the evil done by your own nation.  Either bin Laden acted like Truman, or Truman acted like bin Laden.  WHICH IS IT, PUNK?