A vote for a third party only helps a Democrat or a Republican
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-01 16:32 ID:PPzzFAuv
A vote for a Republican who is not covered in the mainstream media will help out someone who is covered in the media: Obama, Clinton, Giuliani.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-01 16:33 ID:WQLP3URj
i hope ron paul runs as an independent.
90% of his supporters are racist conservatives in denial. Ron Paul could be the Republicunt's Ralph Nader of 2008
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-01 16:36 ID:krB4q9RF
>>8
Ron Paul is no longer ignored by the mainstream media. He's starting to be a top tier candidate now.
What you're saying is the biggest bullshit ever, "vote for the lesser evil."
Also, being a libertarian, I couldn't think of voting for someone else, his policies match mine 99%.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-01 16:42 ID:PPzzFAuv
If you really want to support him, find people who can contribute time or money to his campaign. Do something so that more people know who he is and what he's about.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-01 16:57 ID:k3S4jDJ7
Mike Gravel. I agree with about 80% of what he says and he was a major factor in the ending of Vietnam.
I think Ron Paul's social policies are regressive which is why I can't vote for him.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-01 17:08 ID:PPzzFAuv
It's getting rid of the Fed that's important. I don't care if he rapes babies in his free time.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-01 17:27 ID:rrcjIfIl
im voting for David Cameron oh shit wrong continent
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-01 17:47 ID:KiZP2vwE
I would vote Ron Paul if I was an American citizen.
>>5>>7>>8
Tactical voting is futile, just be narcissistic and proudly tick the box of the man's name who best reflects your ideals.
>>9
We only deny in public, nigger. You libfags are in self-denial.
>>10
Exactly! Anyway, you aren't supposed to fucking vote for the lesser of several evils in the PRIMARY. Seriously, what the fuck? That diminishes the whole idea of having a primary to begin with, and limits the selection availible for the people.