liberals and white imperialists

Why are the liberals so anal about colonialism and imperialism? What's so difficult to understand? The white man came, he was stronger, he took what he want. It was no different before the white man when the Aztecs took what they want and the Apache took what they want. That was how things were back in the day but now whites have changed now and the west is epicly more egalitarian and democratic, of course there are still problems but you are obviously intent on whining and being vindictive towards innocent white people about the problems of 300 years ago so there's no point discussing the problems of today with you.

Besides, there is no rational basis for thinking in collective terms in the first place and if you have to think in collective terms it is still unjustified because other races are no saints either as their crime rates and histories prove.

Liberals are controlled by the jews, so they are usless anyway, who cares about the liberals

I do. There are a lot of liberals and they may not be controlled by the jews.

Why are the sturmfags so anal about jews and their own inferiority complexes? What's so difficult to understand? The jew came, he was smarter, he manipulated you to get what he wanted. It was no different before the jew when the aryan took what they wanted and the indo-european man took what they wanted. That was how things were back in the day but now society has changed now and the west is epicly more liberal and rational, of course there are still problems but you are obviously intent on whining and being vindictive towards innocent jews about the problems of 500 years ago so there's no point discussing the problems of today with you.

Besides, there is no rational basis for thinking in racial terms in the first place and if you have to think in racial terms it is still unjustified because your own race aren't saints either as their crime rates and histories prove.

>>4
So the Jew should receive no retaliation to his behaviour?

>>5
I take it you haven't seen American History X

>>6
What are you on about? It depicted the Jew as an innocent victim, like all Hollywood productions.

>>7
I wasn't aware their were any Jews in that movie at all.
You bluff and continue to spew the same old shit out of that glory hole you call a mouth.

>>8
there*

I take it your english teacher was white and this is how you take your vengeance on him.

>>9
I take it you are mentally feeble and must resort to correcting a minor grammatical error as a substitute for wit.

>>10
What was I supposed to respond to?

"I wasn't aware their were any Jews in that movie at all."
There were, the violins played in the background and the actor played the innocent submissive victim role even before anything negative happenned towards the character.

"You bluff and continue to spew the same old shit out of that glory hole you call a mouth."
Yes, I do indeedly doodly (haha ned flanders!) use the word "and" quite a lot. How silly of me. That is what you are referring to isn't it? You weren't very specific so I will assume you are talking about the word "and".

WHOOO! GO IMPERIALISM!