4chan's Jew conspiracy paranoia

"Conspiracism" is a term used by social scientists and scholars to refer to adherents of conspiracy theory and their way of looking at history and the world around them. The term was popularized by academic Frank P. Mintz in the 1980s.

According to Mintz, conspiracism denotes: "belief in the primacy of conspiracies in the unfolding of history" (1985: p.4):

    "Conspiracism serves the needs of diverse political and social groups in America and elsewhere. It identifies elites, blames them for economic and social catastrophes, and assumes that things will be better once popular action can remove them from positions of power. As such, conspiracy theories do not typify a particular epoch or ideology" (1985: p.199).

Throughout human history, political and economic leaders genuinely have been the cause of enormous amounts of death and misery, and they sometimes have engaged in conspiracies while at the same time promoting conspiracy theories about their targets. Hitler and Stalin would be merely the most prominent examples; there have been numerous others (Arendt). In some cases there have been claims dismissed as conspiracy theories that later proved to have some basis in facts (Fenster, Dean). But the idea that history is controlled by grandiose or long-standing conspiracies is dubious. As historian Bruce Cumings has put it:

    "But if conspiracies exist, they rarely move history; they make a difference at the margins from time to time, but with the unforeseen consequences of a logic outside the control of their authors: and this is what is wrong with 'conspiracy theory.' History is moved by the broad forces and large structures of human collectivities."

The term has also been used by other authors including Michael Kelly, Chip Berlet, and Matthew N. Lyons, among others.

According to Berlet and Lyons, "Conspiracism is a particular narrative form of scapegoating that frames demonized enemies as part of a vast insidious plot against the common good, while it valorizes the scapegoater as a hero for sounding the alarm" (2000: p. 9).

"Conspiracy nut" is a pejorative term sometimes used to describe a conspiracist. It is based upon the perception that such beliefs are unfounded, outlandish, or irrational, or are otherwise unworthy of serious consideration.

The term Judeophobia refers to fear or irrational hatred of Jews. It was invented by Leon Pinsker and first appeared in his pamphlet Autoemancipation, published anonymously in German in September 1882.

As a professional physician, Pinsker preferred the clinical-sounding term Judeophobia to antisemitism (introduced three years earlier by Wilhelm Marr), which he regarded as a misnomer. Pinsker was convinced that pathological, irrational phobia may explain this millennia-old hatred:

    "Judeophobia is a variety of demonopathy... this ghost is not disembodied like other ghosts but partakes of flesh and blood, must endure pain inflicted by the fearful mob who imagines itself endangered... To sum up then, to the living the Jew is a corpse, to the native a foreigner, to the homesteader a vagrant, to the proprietor a beggar, to the poor an exploiter and a millionaire, to the patriot a man without a country, for all a hated rival."

what does any of this have to do with the fact the Israel is a warmongering, shitty nation that stole most of its land???

"Tomatoism" is a term used by social scientists and scholars to refer to adherents of tomato theory and their way of looking at history and the world around them. The term was popularized by academic Frank P. Mintz in the 1980s.

According to Mintz, tomatoism denotes: "belief in the primacy of tomatos in the unfolding of history" (1985: p.4):

    "Tomatoism serves the needs of diverse political and social groups in America and elsewhere. It identifies tomatos, blames them for economic and social catastrophes, and assumes that things will be better once popular action can remove them from positions of power. As such, tomato theories do not typify a particular epoch or ideology" (1985: p.199).

Throughout human history, political and economic leaders genuinely have been the cause of enormous amounts of death and misery, and they sometimes have grown tomatos while at the same time promoting tomato theories about their targets. Hitler and Stalin would be merely the most prominent examples; there have been numerous others (Arendt). In some cases there have been claims dismissed as tomato theories that later proved to have some basis in facts (Fenster, Dean). But the idea that history is controlled by grandiose or long-standing tomatos is dubious. As historian Bruce Cumings has put it:

    "But if tomatos exist, they rarely move history; they make a difference at the margins from time to time, but with the unforeseen consequences of a logic outside the control of their authors: and this is what is wrong with 'tomato theory.' History is moved by the broad forces and large structures of human collectivities."

The term has also been used by other authors including Michael Kelly, Chip Berlet, and Matthew N. Lyons, among others.

According to Berlet and Lyons, "tomatoism is a particular narrative form of scapegoating that frames demonized enemies as part of a vast insidious plot against the common good, while it valorizes the scapegoater as a hero for sounding the alarm" (2000: p. 9).

"tomato nut" is a pejorative term sometimes used to describe a tomatoist. It is based upon the perception that such beliefs are unfounded, outlandish, or irrational, or are otherwise unworthy of serious consideration.

The term tomatophobia refers to fear or irrational hatred of tomatos. It was invented by Leon Pinsker and first appeared in his pamphlet Autoemancipation, published anonymously in German in September 1882.

As a professional physician, Pinsker preferred the clinical-sounding term tomatophobia to anti-lycopersicumism (introduced three years earlier by Wilhelm Marr), which he regarded as a misnomer. Pinsker was convinced that pathological, irrational phobia may explain this millennia-old hatred:

    "Tomatophobia is a variety of demonopathy... this ghost is not disembodied like other ghosts but partakes of flesh and blood, must endure pain inflicted by the fearful mob who imagines itself endangered... To sum up then, to the fruits the tomato is a vegetable, to the native a foreigner, to the homesteader a vagrant, to the proprietor a beggar, to the poor an exploiter and a millionaire, to the patriot a man without a country, for all a hated rival."

>>2
He never said anything about Israel, retarded tomato nut.

>>1
Total bullshit - another attempt to defame those who criticize Jewish or Israeli activities by assigning them another perjorative name. Jewish supremicists want to denounce their critics by simply naming them a "Judeophobe" or "anti-Semite" instead of arguing against the evidence. The fact so many people are held back from saying what they think by fear of being called one of these perjoratives shows how much we are under Jewish supremacist control.

there is no such thing as jewish supremacist control...now american imperilism that exists and has been proven...but your jewish supremicist control has not really been proven with anything valid besides the fact the jews want a country and fought hard to get one and you lable them as trying to take over the world.

Why not kill all the Jews and all of the Muslims...and take the Jew money and Muslim oil, Hail to the American Empire. High Five for World Domination

AIPAC, JINSA, AJC, COP, JCPA and NUFF SAID.

>>7
Now thats a plan!

>>9
its a conspiracy

>>10
where can i join?

>>11
stormfront.org

Larry Craig is a fag

>>1
A conspiracy is by definition any plot involving two or more people.
Are you really so naive that you truly believe that we know everything in history and that the current official story is what really happened in all cases?

We discover new documents leading to new interesting theories every year, right now people are investigating the Hitler-Stalin relationship during WW 2, in order to try and justify Stalin's strange actions after Hitler attacked Russia.
We have even found a new letter that supposedly was sent to Stalin by Hitler, and if it proves to be authentic then we'll know that Hitler pretended to be Stalin's friend and it would explain a lot.

Reichstag fire? Conspiracy. Now almost all historians believe that the Nazis were responsible.

Pinochet? Conspiracy. Now we know how the US put him into power.

MK-ULTRA? Conspiracy. If you don't know about this, you should really look into it.

Operation Mockingbird. Conspiracy. Heh, this one of the reasons why you've never heard of it.

COINTELPRO? Conspiracy. The FBI office was broken into in 1971.

Operation Northwoods? Conspiracy. Now documents have been declassified and published.

The list goes on...

Not believing in any conspiracy because the alien abduction people are nuts, is just a massive sweeping generalization and lack of critical thinking.

fuck the jews

u just want jew cock that why u soo mean to them

>>14
None of these conspiracies are true. Why not focus on REAL problems? Like terrorism, for instance.

>>17
Tourism moar liek. AMIRITE?

>>17
yeah, you go ahead and go against 99.9% of all historians that have studied the rise of hitler
I'm sure you are right and the people who have studied this for decades are wrong.

>>5
My God you're retarded

Most people don't believe in so called Conspiracy Theories because they go against what we call common knowledge. We like to think of ourselves as intelligent beings, with high critic skills, fighting for their ideas. This couldn't be farther from the truth. While this could be told of some people, most of us just take the ideas/facts from other people and never question their accuracy. Why we do that is very simple: in a group of people, those that don't think the same a rejected. And this fear of exclusion subconsciously prevent you from behaving 'the bad way'. Now every thing's OK, you can go out talking to people about society and being cheered with much agreement. Sometime you'd hear about other point of views on a subject and think "OH my god a <insert discriminated population here>, those people are fucking sick". The phrase may continue, depending on the sensitivity of the subject by "let's not hear this crap/aren't there laws against this/we should put them in camps/I'd fucking kill them". Now we can see how this behavior is easily manipulable. If you're in a position to be trusted, you repeat the same lie/misconception over and over again and it will eventually become the truth. Now you think, WTF, what kind of person would do that? are they pure evil? don't they think they'll go to hell? how can they look at themselves in a mirror? The truth is, they all think they're lying for a 'greater good'. The greatest atrocities were done for a brighter future. Now seeing how many times the people have been misled in the past, you can't deny conspiracies did and will happen. The hard part is knowing if some of them are going on right now.

>>19
The reichstag fire and it's role in Hitler's propoganda campaign is a typical history 101 question because it tests a student's ability to distinguish conjecture from what the sources actually tell us. The fact that Hitler was a dodgy character and took advantage of the reichstag fire to blame the communists has no bearing on who actually started it.

Go right ahead and present my argument to a history teacher.

Then present it to your sociology teacher and cry that the history teacher is an evil nazi because he won't believe your conspiracy theory, maybe he'll let you suck his dick!

>>22
Of course it's very hard to prove something beyond a shadow of a doubt when it comes to Hitler's Germany (it's very hard to prove anything beyond a shadow of a doubt), he didn't keep any records of anything.
This is why the Nuremberg trial was somewhat problematic.
But I never said that historians know Nazis burnt down the reichstag, I said that they believe that Hitler did it, because that simply is the most reasonable explanation.

Do you honestly believe the Nazi version of the events is the absolute truth?
If not, conspiracy at work.

If you really desire another example from that time period which has been 'proven', then how about the manner in which the invasion of Poland started.

sage

"Most people don't believe in so called Conspiracy Theories because they go against what we call common knowledge. We like to think of ourselves as intelligent beings, with high critic skills, fighting for their ideas. This couldn't be farther from the truth."

So says any believer in extraterrestrial coverups, Satanic black masses, Freemason Illuminati, 9/11 was an inside job, the FDA it trying to make you sick to support the pharmaceutical and food industry, Holocaust deniers, and any other set of ideas that claims ordinary people are only "sheeple" blindly having the wool over their eyes, oblivious to the real truth.  Even cults and Scientologists have this "rational" view.  And Christians. 

>>1
uh, no?

Ok, you want real conspiracy, here I go:
The president of country A and his staff tell repeatedly to their people that country B has weapons of mass destruction whereas they have no proof about that. Eventually, country B is invaded and no so called WMD are found. But it doesn't matter, most people of country A still believe they actually found them and where saved from a great danger. And by the way, who care? Now country C obviously wants Nuclear weapons (for all of OUR analysts). We have to do something about it.

>>23
There is a lot more evidence explaining the reasons for Hitler's invasion of Poland than what caused the reichstag fire.

EW, JEWS!

I fucking love tomatos.

!SWEJ, WE