I am very concerned about women's issues and women's rights. We need more courses in women's issues and women's rights for young women and we need a president who will be an advocate for women! I think it is rather refreshing that we are having a discourse on who will be the best candidate for women for a change! Hillary is right on!
So, who do you think is the best candidate for women's issues and women's rights? Hillary is the obviously pick! Having a woman in the white house will be good for women across the country and will show women that women can rule even the highest office in the land! Hillary has been a leading advocate for women, reducing violence against women by leading efforts to ban guns and pornography, and will work to keep abortion safe for women! Hillary is the only one who can beat the far right anti-women candidates who want to take away womens rights and push their male-chauvinist agenda! It is time for a woman in the white house! It is time for Hillary!
Hillary is endorsed by the National Organization for Women and will promote womens rights! Empower women! Vote Hillary in 2008! http://www.now.org/press/03-07/03-28.html
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-28 2:05 ID:vu/Mzq8q
Hillary 14 88
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-28 2:14 ID:HFP5V3S6
Hillary 14 88
Name:
LordRiordan2007-09-28 2:17 ID:tJbc1q+i
Hillary treats her people like shit... here is a video of her going crazy and proving my point.
“Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price.”
- Hillary Clinton, September 13, 2001
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
- Hillary Clinton Addressing the U.S. Senate October 10, 2001
“We must stay the course” in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and asked for more troops to finish the job.
“We have to exert all of our efforts militarily”
- November 29, 2003 Hilary visits the troops In Iraq and Afghanistan
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-03 20:37
Fuck Hilary. Not literally, though. Whoa, bad thoughts . . .
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-03 21:55
╔╗╔╦══╦╗╔╦══╦╦╦╗
║╚╝║╔╗║╚╝║╔╗║║║║
║╔╗║╠╣║╔╗║╠╣╠╬╬╣
╚╝╚╩╝╚╩╝╚╩╝╚╩╩╩╝NO THE WORLD WILL BE RULED BY FELINE BITCHES.
Kucinich also supports a FEDERAL ban on handguns. I think it goes without saying that faggot would sign any gun control law or gun ban that crossed his desk. Then he would expand Federal regulatory power under the commerce clause to a degree that the Founders never would have dreamed of, and would veto any School Choice or Education Reform laws that manage to make it through the legislature.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-05 7:08
>>126 >>127
Moar:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
>>136 ORLY? You must have written your Congressman real scathing letters, then, when he bailed out the airlines after 911, and the banks today. No Socialism for ANYONE ... including rich corporations! Right?
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-06 19:48
I can't believe this topic still exists, it been debated for over a month.
>>138
There's been no real debate. The Hillaristas are just wrong since there's almost nothing about her that follows Democrat principles. She's all about the expression of power and money over the people.
Once the Hillaristas finally produce true facts about the so-called left-leaning philosophies of this candidate, then we can move forward into actual debate. Until then, they're only supporting a propaganda image of Hillary, which is just not the person at all. If they insist that that image is true, then we may as well go back to talking about George Bush the "compassionate conservative".
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-08 10:11
>>139
The democratic party is 'the party of affirmative action,' no? They are prooving it now by nominating someone they honestly don't believe is the best candidate just because she is a woman.
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
END WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE
>>1
Empower women? People should be treated fairly not given excess power. This can be achieved through liberty, we can all agree tothat. Vote Ron Paul.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-14 5:09
Anyone who votes Hillary is either evil or out of his fucking mind.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-14 5:12
>>149 Ron Paul will not support and advance government-funded childcare programs to help women and single-mothers enter the workplace more effectively. Ron does not support sensible restrictions on the proliferation of pornographic smut and other offensive material that degrades women in the eyes of the public. We need Hillary Clinton and her \"it takes a village\" approach to childcare and other social issues, particularly for women\'s issues. The Republican party does not adequately address these concerns.
I think this thread is a combination of "Women need more rights" and "Vote for hillary because she has a vagina...I think."
"pornographic smut and other offensive material that degrades women in the eyes of the public."
Rule34 or gtfo.
The fact of the matter is you don't see things that intentionally degrade women in public, and if you do, odds are it's on TV late at night or something and displayed for the sake of humor, and the same goes for men. Lul a bit, disagree with what they have to say, and respect their right to say it.
Anything else is most likely a result of some oversensitive lady getting offended just for the sake of having an excuse to whine about something.
"Ron Paul will not support and advance government-funded childcare programs to help women and single-mothers enter the workplace more effectively."
That's a good point. Point taken.
"We need Hillary Clinton and her \"it takes a village\" approach to childcare and other social issues, particularly for women\'s issues."
Though this may not be what you mean to say, it seems that you're basically saying we should elect Hillary Clinton so she can spend her time as presedent focusing on women's rights. There's more going on in the country and the world than that. I know that women's rights isn't Clinton's soul objective/ plan/ whatever, and you do make a valid point or two, but if you're trying to persuade someone to vote for someone, you'll need to give more reasons to do so than one aspect of society.
But hey, what do I know? I'm just some 15 year old.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-14 6:29
>>151
"Ron Paul will not support and advance government-funded childcare programs to help women and single-mothers enter the workplace more effectively."
Why should I care? If you have kids, that's your problem. Deal with it you stupid bitch.
"We need Hillary Clinton and her \"it takes a village\" approach to childcare and other social issues, particularly for women\'s issues."
I certainly don't need it. I can care for my children just fine, so fuck off.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-14 20:13
>>151
Maybe lack of childcare funding will keep idiots who can't afford children from reproducing.
RON PAUL '08.