Hey look everyone. The OP couldn't provide any premises to his conclusion and further weakened it by adding the clause that it was only his personal opinion.
Let me give you a tip son: "The OP fucked his dad. So the OP is a faggot who should eat shit and die" is much better supported and sounds more forceful than the wimpy "I think the OP is a faggot who should eat shit and die."
either way, you're a spineless queer. i hope you get run over by a train.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-26 19:33 ID:azFTcSfn
>>2
Well, at least he qualified it by saying that it was his opinion. That's at least better than RedCream's "this is how it is and if you disagree you're a fucking moron".
>>3
I'll mark you down as "bothered by facts and logic assembled into an unassailable argument". {check}
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-26 23:59 ID:MiJHoJH4
>>4
Sorry, but #2 explained it better than I can. You have never posted anything here even close to an 'unassailable' argument. How can I say that? It's because you NEVER phrase anything as an argument to begin with. You spend so much time on Wikipedia looking up "logical fallacies" to accuse people of, but apparently you've never heard of the simple concept of a 'premise'. Try it sometime.
>>5
Provide an example of these so-called not-even-close arguments. Copypasta or STFU.
>>6
You've got to get up a little bit earlier to even make such a statement. But go ahead and believe whatever little nonsense you want. Hell, you probably even believe in a divinity. Darrrrrr!