>>33
You're still talking past me and seems that you're doing so as to not confront
my point. Respond to the underlined or it's an omission of failure. I've broken it down into bite size piece for you this time, so try to stay on topic. I'll keep bumping and returning to this thread as long as you continue to dodge all the hide behind this hyperliberalism shit so that you don't have to own up to the retarded statements you've made.
1. Reason being is that I simply believe (and have repeatedly stated) that:
Discussion of race, more specifically, inter-racial relationships should not always entail a discussion of "racial differences" existent or fabricated. <=== In this case objectively unprovable on your part and FABRICATED.
2.
Just because we're talking about a black person and a white person doesn't automatically mean we need to discuss "black vs white" person. Which is ironically enough, what you've accused me of.
3.
Doing so, constantly is how we (and by "we", I mean "you") end up keeping such convenient and objectively unprovable bigotries such as "Everybody knows Black dudes beat their white girlfriends...because they're white". <=== How is this not prejudice?