>>12
I don't know what it's called, but an "infix" doesn't break up the word there, Einstein. You tend to add other words before and after. Like, hourfagster = hour + -fag- + -ster.
>>13
America. Just because I'm an American, doesn't mean I have to practice or identify with the loser American lifestyle. I'm surrounded by American psychos, if you'll forgive the redundancy. The believe in a big Jew in the sky, they believe housing only goes up in value, they believe the stock market is how they'll get rich, and finally they believe that Iraq had WMDs. In other words: they're American fucks. They're dipshitwads of the highest degree.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-20 15:35 ID:QQLkY5n2
>>14
I got rich through the stock market. Everyone would get slightly and steadily wealthier if no one sold shares, but I'm cleverer you see, I do my research. Like the average retard I keep most of my capital tied up in stock and reinvest the dividends, the difference is I watch carefully for incoming shit, exploit it then get out before it hits the fan, so to speak.
>>15
Your feat is not widely duplicated, by design. If too many people use such methods, the market seizes up, goes flat, or undergoes such wild swings that your methods will fail you. Necessarily, you must remain in the tiny minority, as is the case with any lottery winner.
Therefore, my condemnation stands as still true: Americans widely and falsely believe that the stock market will make them rich. The last generation at least should prove THAT wrong rather handily.
Name:
LordRiordan2007-08-20 18:12 ID:F0lnG8c7
Hey RedCream.. You pacifist fag (I hope you know who I am =p)... They did find WMDs you stupid cock faggot.
And just so you know... the average person in every country is a giant dickshitfagfucktard. I'm not sure if you think everywhere else is so much better, I'm making the assumption you do, but you are terribly misguided and absorbed by a certain 'hate America' ideologue.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-20 18:16 ID:36mQQqrK
whoa! RedCream said something i actually agree with. O_O
>>17 Citation Required. A few old munitions found left over from 1991 don't count as WMDs required to stage the invasion of a nation. Try again, Imperialist asshole!
At any rate, no WMDs, no Hussein, no nothin'. What are your cockfags-in-camo still doing there, stumpycock? Oh yeah, that's right: IRAQ STILL HAS OIL TO STEAL. Way wonderful to make your Imperial aims so transparent, fuckshot!
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-20 18:56 ID:ggl0Hjcc
So what if it was for oil? Oil's an increasingly scarce and valuable resource. I'm sure most of the people in the world, given the chance, would steal trillions of dollars worth of resources.
Stealing it form a dictator and putting in a democratic government seems a lot more reasonably than stealing it from a democratically elected government (which by the look of things His Highness George W(anker) Bush seems to be planning on doing with Iran.
>>17
Aren't you that namefag that stopped posting in '06 since people hated you so much for being an idiot?
Name:
LordRiordan2007-08-20 19:04 ID:F0lnG8c7
I didn't stop posting.
Name:
LordRiordan2007-08-20 19:06 ID:F0lnG8c7
The amount of oil that could be stolen doesn't account for the cost of the war you idiot.
Gb2/fail/
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-20 19:12 ID:H3RnPPfw
Bush/Rice/Cheney all have huge investments in oil companies (could be wrong about Cheney, but i'm pretty sure it's him) so would surely profit if those companies gained a lot more oil.
They don't actually pay for the war themselves, the taxpayer does that.
So they make a lot of money with no great financial loss to themselves.
Name:
LordRiordan2007-08-20 19:14 ID:F0lnG8c7
I'm interested in seeing actual figures of their profits. I have yet to see them.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-20 19:19 ID:H3RnPPfw
All i know is they own large stakes in oil companies (i saw it on Channel 4 news and read it in the Daily Telegraph, which are easily the most reliable wideley avaliable sources of information in the UK).
These companies were contracted to extract Iraqi oil.
The share prices went up ergo Bush et al made money.
Name:
LordRiordan2007-08-20 19:34 ID:F0lnG8c7
Still claims without figures... I hear a lot of the same thing without any numbers to back up the significants. It's not exactly uncommon to invest large amounts into energy stock or a company you are involved with.
This still doesn't indicate a means to go to war... there are many other factors including failed UN regulation and (although now wrong) information about WMDs. The fact that we are still there is entirely different though... pulling out would simply be a disaster politically and would be a huge waist of dollars.
I don't like bush and I have no doubt that there isn't money to be made by many individuals (mostly non politicians in my speculation)... but I have doubts that the situation is as simple as everyone makes it out to be (IE just about oil and land).
Without real numbers... claims have no power (although people give them much more influence than they deserve)
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-20 19:48 ID:H3RnPPfw
Well i cba to go traipsing through the net to find them. The point is that i read them.
I don't think it's just about oil and land either, maybe Bush genuinely believed he was doing the right thing and (like someone reading my unsourced statements which said that they all have shares in oil companies may do) just used crap information to back up something he'd already decided to do.
The wars have made America seem far too weak on the world stage. The fact that Britain supported them (instead of trying to address even more significant problems like the drugs smuggling through Guinea Bissau) makes me ashamed.