FUCK NON-AMERICA LAND.

ALL YOU FAGGOTS CRITICIZE US, BUT YOU ONLY HAVE THAT RIGHT BECAUSE WE GIVE IT TO YOU. MOST OF THE FOREIGN COUNTRIES ARE FAR ENOUGH AWAY FOR US TO NUKE THEM WITHOUT POLLUTING OUR AREA, AND WE HAVE STEALTH BOMBERS TO DO IT WITH.

NEXT TIME YOU TALK ABOUT AMERICA, DON'T CRITICIZE US. THANK US FOR OUR MERCY.

>>46
Those are certainly possible operating procedures.  However, restricting access to roads slows them down by simple physics.  If we truly did privatize all (or most) of the roads, then traffic will slow and that will create unsolvable problems.  Really, I'm going to have to insist that a common road system paid for by use-linked taxes is the only way to keep America efficiently and usably mobile.

Again, that doesn't mean that roads still can't be privatized in some sense.  State governments have already taken steps to subcontract road maintenance out.  By approaching that in such a piecemeal fashion, we truly have a chance at finding a more optimal system for use+access+cost.

>>47
You must know an entire other set of Nader fans, since demonstrating such seemingly callous disregard for the common good is something notably ABSENT in both Nader and his supporters.  Perhaps you mis-spoke.

Perhaps if I was more precise, you'd better understand:

"People who indulge in stupidity when they have every chance to avoid it, SHOULD suffer."