Global Warming is real

just look outside morons

u fukin idiots.
1970's TIME magazine headlines dominated by theories of a GLOBAL COOLING!! ffs, L 2 NOT WOMAN ! ! ~ change ur mind again and I'll give the international public a facial

well fuck it all those old money pricks with their waterfront
properties will loose out... sooo who cares? they are the ones that own the stocks in the companies that are fucking everything up. they'll probably build floating whorehouses teaming with
mutant mermaid creatures though... srsy who could resist giving that a try? well... the rich still get richer,

mmm tentacles

>>12
get the facts from somewhere else but flamers. CO2 has nothing to do with warming the globe, it's another way around. When earth warms up, CO2 levels go up.

I could use some global cooling now. It's fucking hot.

>>43

lulz.  masterful troll

>>43
Nice theory. For morons.

>>43
>>46
There's a small part of that theory that actually does apply, seeing how permafrost and continental-shelf areas contain methane, CO₂ and other carbon-based gases held in suspension.  Warming these areas will tend to release that stuff.

HOWEVER, those releases are just follow-on or cascading effects from the initial cause.  The base cause remains the same:  Increasing the levels of greenhouse gases (like CO₂) in the atmosphere will increase the temperature of the atmosphere.  There's no serious or meritorious claim against that (except on headfuck shows like Rush Limbaugh).

>>25
Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years. Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than they have been for over a million years.

In conclusion, nuclear power is the future. Therei s global warming and if there is nothing we can do about that, there is still plenty of oil but it is getting more difficult to extract as easily accesible supplies are exhausted. Energy companies need to realise that in the next 20-30 years oil and gas will make up a smaller percentage of our energy consumption and we must invest in nuclear power.

There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide. There is no such thing as carbon dioxide.

>>49
Invest in a dead planet? Wow, just wow.

Renewable resources motherfucker, do you use it?

>>50
That is not a very compelling argument.

>>51
They suck. Nuclear power it is!

>>49

If we'd completely switch to nuclear power, we'd run out of uranium in 30 years.

what ever happened to that salt water idea? burns when you shoot radio waves at it

>>54
There are 40 million tons of easily extracted uranium that we are using now and the oceans contain an estimated 4.3 billion metric tons of uranium which can be extracted at greater expense but not uneconomically (energy prices will increase anyway). This is enough to last 2000 years.

>>54
FAG

>>55
link pls

>>56

IN THEORY.

>>59
In fact.

>>60 is largely right, >>59 .  One way to look at the ocean is that its the largest, continuous body of ore on Earth.  Sure, processing a cubic kilometer of ocean to extract some grams of uranium seems pointless, until you realize that we're running out of oil, coal is fairly dirty, and sunlight is free.  Why not put a modest platform on the ocean, powered by sunlight or an OTEC, and let it churn away collecting uranium?

This site:

http://peakoildebunked.blogspot.com/2006/01/207-uranium-from-seawater-part-1.html

... explores these claims.  Assuming a uniform concentration of 3mg U / m³ in seawater, processing about 300 cubic meters of seawater at 100% recovery would produce 1kg of Uranium.  Assuming a conservative 10% recovery process, that's 3000 m³, or a cubical body of seawater about 14m (47ft) to a side.  That sounds workable.

I wish I could get through 300 cubic meters of semen.

>>61

That's interesting, I had no idea. Thanks for the information.

      ███░░░░░░░█████████████
      ███░░░░░░░█████████████
      ███░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░
      ███░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░
      ███░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░
      ███░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░
      ███████████████████████
NADER ███████████████████████ GORE
      ░░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░███
      ░░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░███
      ░░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░███
      ░░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░███
      █████████████░░░░░░░███
      █████████████░░░░░░░███

>>62

That's interesting, I had no idea. Thanks for the information.