The War on Drugs

Here's a TV show I found devoted to the subject.  It is divided into three parts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31mjvdPP7dQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HgrAuvUvtg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72viXhsKU-M

>>40
Heh, well put.

I haven't met a "zOMG liberal!!1!" who is in favour of open borders, and I'm surrounded by people whose inclinations fall heavily on that side. Maybe this group is amazingly exceptional, or maybe >>39 is full of it.

So, how's that in-group echo-chamber doing, RedCream? GO TEAM (fapfapfap)!

>>41

From my experience, I've met more Republicans (read:Friedmanites) in favor of open boarders than I have met YAY MULTICULTURALISM Liberals praising open boarders.

>>40
>>41
Further fails.  I spoke about the elites, and SPECIFICALLY identified them as monied corporations and yuppies, but YOU fags drew the inference that that identification is only partisan politics.  Eat a dick with a boiling-oil chaser.

>>42 at least identified that "YAY MULTICULTURALISM Liberals" exist.  They are out in there in great numbers, undermining the basic notion of nationalism.  With all their education, you'd THINK that they'd understand that globalism doesn't work for the masses as they allegedly claim.  Globalism merely ensures that adherents end up living in a Third World environment, where the tiny few take jets and cars over and past the hordes of desperate poor.

Fuck the war on drugs.  My body, my property, my choice bitches.  Hands off. 

>>43

Hm. No doubt they call you RedCream because of the mixture of jizz and ass blood that leaks down your pants leg in your wake. Using the term "liberal" or "conservative" is and always has been automatic fail. Sorry, gayboy, but you can't bold and italic your way out of this one.

Furthermore, if you believe in "Multiculturist Liberals" then you - in effect - are adhering to the "party vs party" concept via use of faggotry-laden terms. If you believe in the two party war, just say it. Don't try and change your reply just because you got caught with your mouth around your own cock.

I gotta say, RedCream, your posts are really starting to grate on my nerves. You flitter around here like a 50 year old New Jersey queen who just discovered the "New American Century" website. Maybe if you keep so many dicks out of your orifaces you'd have enough oxygen in your brain to form a statement that didn't sound like it was coming right out of the mouth of Nathan Lane.

Do 4chan a favor. Take your retarded slapstick political commentary to CNN, where I assure you it's not only appreciated, but celebrated!

>>45
I don't believe in the Two-Party Duopoly in the sense that I support it.  I merely report it.  However, the gayfaggors on both sides ("two wings on the same bird of prey") complain when they're identified.  This much explains YOUR complaint.

The sad fact of the matter is that regardless of how much you don't like it, "Multiculturist Liberals" are as much a problem for illegal immigration in America as are the CorpFags.  Both are monied elites who have great power to determine the direction of public policy under the control of government apparatus.  The working man is long forgotten to both classes.  Both have the SAME GOAL in mind, for different reasons.  CorpFags want cheap labor (regardless of legality) since it's cheap.  LibFags want the downtrodden masses (regardless of legality) since that fits their deranged view of nationalism.

I'm sure that you're just another LibFag who's looking forward to having a few wetback servants in your condo as you hit your 50s and are looking to retire, as all LibFags do.  The sad truth is that those same wetbacks will steal your shit and leave you bleeding to death like a slaughtered pig in your own hot tub.  Well, until that glorious day of Liberal Blowback -- where the same cities the LibFags fap in, will be burning from the illegal immigrants they allowed in -- I'm here to call you out on your mental illness (since Liberalism is as much a mental illness as Capitalism is).

>>46
oooh burn

Holy shit, anti-chan came out of the woodwork! Against RedCream?

Awesome! The Apocalypse is coming!

Also, since when are "yuppie Liberals" an elite?

>>48
Since Clinton I.

I don't be-- *sound of homosexual cock gagging*

>>49
Clinton wasn't exactly liberal though. He was more old-school conservative, giving a shit about fiscal responsibility.

I think the world is turning upside down.

>>46
>>47
same same

And....yeah, sorry, all I hear is: "Slurp, slurp, slurp, love the cock long time." when you sit down (on a spiked dildo) to type. Your post literally makes no fucking sense in that the only relevant "LibFags" are "CorpFags" by default. Your whole vernacular is fagged up from the ass up. But leave it to you to dice up turds and give them cute little names.

Resorting to "You must be a LibFag" is only yet another indicator of your crippling retardation no doubt brought about from your mom blood-queefing you out of her rathole snatch in a porta-john at a dike parade. Just face it: You sound like a total idiot and the only reason I'm replying is for the fun of dissecting your latent faggotry for future generations. 

I advise you to take what I said about the CNN messageboards to heart. Either that or continue with your usual past-time: Sniffing dude's exercise bike seats at the gym.

>>52
What, do you think you're posting so that 12-yr-olds read this and will be impressed?  CorpFags are the business elite, who are generally Republican.  LibFags are the yuppie sheep who bow to their monied masters, drooling with plans for all that money once they steal some.  When it comes to attacking (or condoning attacking) the working man, both CorpFags and LibFags are the same since the effect it the same.

Evidenced by your bristling, anti-chan, you must also be a LibFag.  I hardly think a CorpFag wastes time on 4chan ... but angsty LibFags are a precise fit.

>>53

so because he says that the dichotomy between liberals and conservatives is an illusionary meme, you continue to force and defend their distinction by calling him a liberal?

that doesn't make any sense.......oh wait! I get it! you're a troll! GOTCHA TROLL! BACK UNDER YOUR BRIDGE!
 

>>53

Being trolled or not, I truly feel nothing but pity for you. In your confusion and sickness you can't even rise above your own partisan talking points while in the middle of discussing the inherent fallacy of partisanship. If you truly agreed with me, there's no way on earth you would've thought to call me a liberal.

I guess if you can't understand something, then it has to go into one of your little categories somewhere so that- instead of having intelligent discourse, you can instead- marginalize and pigeon-hole.

You're just one of those loudmouth types that thinks he has the solution to everyone's problem even though he IS a major contributing factors to the problem. Try figuring out how to get out the figurative realm of your mother's basement before tackling adult discussion.

-ac

>>53
You would think that, but can you explain why LibFags have a propensity towards asshole sucking?