I didn't realize that Whites were represented by those with blonde hair and blue eyes. What tiny percentage of the White population is that way? Yeh, I thought so. When are the North Gaul types going to realize that they don't speak for the "rest of us"?
Name:
Thelema2007-07-20 10:14 ID:XcyY/jG9
I'm a North Gaul type, but I think they really mean they speak for aryans and that they are ''''''''pure whites''''''''.
Well, #6, since they are a tiny minority of the White racial type, they are perfectly free to retreat to Finland or something, where us darker-eyed types can be stopped via immigration laws from bothering their blessed purity. Well, THAT, and we can ship them contaminated toothpaste to foul the maintenance of their perfect Nordic smiles.
#12: {wiping tears} That's the most profound compliment I've had recently. Thank you, honestly. Yes, everyone should be RedCream, since RedCream is many times more sensible than the average twit who comes to 4chan to talk some smack.
Of course, Thel, you must realize that it's possible that posting under my moniker is done to confuse others and discourage debate. If that's truly the case here, do you want to let them win? The choice is yours.
Name:
Thelema2007-07-20 10:34 ID:XcyY/jG9
>>>That's the most profound compliment I've had recently. Thank you, honestly.
Heh, it's nice to hear it.
I shall brandish my gaulic longsword and defend myself from the hordes of Redcream's if it is neccasary, or maybe accept them with open arms...
Thel, I believe it's "Gallic". Additionally, if you actually think it's healthy to accept 4channers with open arms (definably, when all your sensitive areas are exposed) than I can only urge you to stop and think that one through with more clarity. He hee!
Speaking of chicks brandishing longswords in their ancestral fashion, did you see the movie with that red-haired woman from ER? {frantic googling} Aha, Alex Kingston in "Boudica" (i.e. 'Braveheart with a Bra'). Great movie.
Name:
Thelema2007-07-20 10:49 ID:XcyY/jG9
Sadly not, but I've already heard alot of Boudica.
>Thel, I believe it's "Gallic".
You're right, maybe I should stop smoking the ol' jamaican woodvine.
Back to topic.
No neighborhood should tolerate the presence and actions of niggers, be they White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Indian, etc. Decent folk are completely incompatible with niggers.
First you must determine if the Black kids that move in are niggers or not.
If not, then everything is OK.
If so, then burn a cross on their lawn. In some places, this may backfire, so be careful in judging the usefulness of the burning cross. You never know when Liberals will pop outta the woodwork and try to make a "poor downtrodden Blacks" issue out of it. Liberals don't understand (or want to understand) that the issue is not about Blacks; instead, it's about niggers.
If a cross-burnin' is not in order, then you'll have to wait and watch like a hawk until all the niggers leave the residence for some reason. Even work-averse niggers have to leave the house for some reason, eventually ... like to go get another bottle or pack of whatever niggers are addicted to nowadays. Once the home is temporarily empty, burn the home down. You don't have to actually destroy the home; just burning the niggers OUT would work. Note that there's no need to be concerned about the landlord, if any ... since landlords that rent to niggers are niggers themselves and deserve no consideration.
I don't feel any reluctance to a-burnin' thangs since niggers not only bring the ghetto with them by association, but that niggers intentionally restructure their neighborhoods as ghettos in the first place. The ghetto is the natural habitat of the American nigger, just like fast food is the natural diet (I think of McDonald's as "nigger chow").
Again, this is not a racial issue. The majority of niggers in America are White. There's no natural right to bring crime, fear and despondency into a working man's neighborhood. I'm sure the Liberals disagree, but they're fucking Liberals and we can rightfully dismiss their opinions therefore.
[misbehaves on 4chan as LaCosaNostradamus]
Name:
Thelema2007-07-20 11:06 ID:XcyY/jG9
>>First you must determine if the Black kids that move in are niggers or not.
I had an arguement with one, bad idea, they just call the fucking race card if you try to reason with them, he nearly landed me in prison, but gladly police are racists.
The niggers aren't making ghettos, the government is making ghettos for them, atleast in England where you have a designated 'bade area' (normally teraced houses/apartment complexes [I think you call them blocks or something]) and designated 'good areas' which aren't neccasarily better off, they just dump criminals in a specific place, literally.
I guess Liberals are pansies, but often I meet with 'niggers' and interact with them, they often have next to decent reasons as to why they are like that.
SWEET!!! My admirer is bringing out my K5 rants (#19)! Oh frabjous day! Immortality is mine!
Unfortunately for your sentiment, Thel, niggers DO form ghettos ... with the cooperation of government. I'm not sure who starts the process (I mean, other than White Flight) but as a nigger robs, the government gets tired of chasing him, then the nigger learns to rob some more, etc. The next thing you know, homes need bars on the windows and no matter how much patrolling, the police can't stop crime.
#22, not all the people native to the Caucasus (hence, Caucasian) are blue-eyed blondes (BEBs). The BEBs are a Nordic subset of the Caucasian race and in NO WAY lead the racial phenotype by characteristics. In reality, the BEBs are a tiny minority and if there's any stomping to be done on the basis of minority, it would be THEM who would be stomped. So, be careful with all that stompin', WhitePower freaks!
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-20 18:14 ID:2J0ktUBR
Jesus, namefags are faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaags.
#24, you sound like you're in NEED ... in need of namefag SEED, freshly fired from the cockhead a-quiver, and steaming wetly in the cool morning air. Open your mouth, big boy! It's time for the Human Howitzer to fire off a few range-finding rounds.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-21 8:20 ID:QIQZsIPu
>>25
Dammit, ive excited it, now we will never get rid of it.
And, there's nothing wrong with that, Thelema Clone #28/12ZJb930. Anal sex is assuredly part of the pleasures that are open between one person and another person, between whom there is at least one penis, even a dildo of sufficiently filling girth.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-24 10:35 ID:TD5Fb/AZ
>>29
What if your penis is larger than most dildos, is this bad?
From the ads in pr0n mags, and the use of them in pr0n itself, most dildos seem to be of such size that one might get a complex about it, if one didn't know it's just marketing hype. Contrary to popular assumption, women don't have much use for such prodigious prongs. Sucking them off is more work, and enveloping them in cuntflesh can be painful. So, there's a significant chance that having a penis larger than most dildos (which are fairly sizable in the first place) is a bad thing. You'd have to find a woman whose mouth is the size of Carly Simon's (if not actually being Carly Simon herself, but I don't know her schedule for cocksuckery), and/or a vagina the size of a porthole.
From the answers I've obtained by asking directly, women have a preferred size for the penises they take into their bodies, and that size is not as large as Hollywood would have you believe.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-24 23:08 ID:stNif3z3
It ain't length. Its width.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-25 0:21 ID:iwMeH93W
*cough* attention whore / troll's attempt to start a flame war. If it is not, then the person is a damn idiot. enough said.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-25 1:21 ID:ucVAIxR1
chinks = sexy
dark lovely black girls = sexy
blonde/ blue eyes = sexy
old = not sexy
Jewesses = sometimes sexy
Indians = not really sexy
my 2 cents
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-25 2:21 ID:/kLD5GPl
native americans = incredibly sexy
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-25 2:47 ID:wFw11qJ9
>>35
Damn straight. I love me a busty Nordic babe, but a sweet little Kiowa gets my blood going.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-25 3:25 ID:9j32d/cQ
This thread is racist!
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-25 4:57 ID:aPSSQaRl
chinks = sex object
dark lovely black girls = object of pleasure
blonde/ blue eyes = marriage + genetically superior kids
old = As a general rule if they can run 100 minus their age multiplied by 10 in metres they remain sexy into old age.
Jewesses = old age sexy rule applies to them even when they are young
Indians = sexy if they are not plump, with other races plump but not too fat works, with indians they just look fucked up