Water Powered Car Inventor Murdered

Alright guys, I've got something to share with you. There was a man named Steve Meyer that lived in Grove City. He is no longer with us, as he was killed in '98 pretty sure it was only on local news programs, which is why the damage is localized and only a couple of people actually know about it.

What he did was he combined water and electricity. It turns into a gas called HHO, which can power a car for 100 miles a gallon on...water. Yes, essentially free power. All it costs is 1500$ to equip your car, and you'd never have to go to a gas station again.

He was from Grove City, Ohio, just a couple of miles away from me. My father knew the guy, and trust me, his water car was not bullshit. It worked, and it was absolutely amazing. Revolutionary, something that would solve so many problems and make life so much easier.

He was repeatedly threatened by Oil Companies, bribed 1 billion to shelf his idea, constantly pressured by the government who was breathing down his neck. Well, one night at a restaraunt to celebrate his invention and it's sale in a couple of weeks so that it would go into mass production. He took a drink from his glass, ran out into the parking lot and died. He was poisoned to death by our government. This can be seen easily, because just a few days later they took all of his assets, patents and inventions and shoved them in a government vault never to be seen again.

What I want to know from you guys, is do you think that this is right? You probably say, "Oh, that's messed up" But do you really care? Do you honestly give a damn that the government you know and love is holding you back and witholding technology that could potentially turn this world into a utopia?

Site with Videos: http://easygrowhouseplants.blogspot.com/2006/12/inventor-of-water-powered-car-murdered.html

Actual Patent: http://www.google.com/patents?id=fPEbAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&dq=%22stanley+meyer%22

Stan Meyer's Site: http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.htm












Guys, please keep in mind that I am not some crackpot conspiracy theorist. I'm not just yelling, "AAAAH! GOVERNMENT EVIL GOVERNMENT BAD SOMEONE HELP OMG!!!" okay? You guys will see, in time, the corruption of our government and the foul weeds that choke this garden. The viel has been swept from my eyes, and hopefully soon yours too. Because do you know what it means when everyone starts seeing this for what it really is?

Revolution. It's coming.

I am not a conspiracy theorist. There are only three things that cannot be hidden long; The Sun, The Moon, and The Truth.

#16, we had some fairly good technological progress before the imposition of the corporate-dominance model.  That implies that there was an extant state of returns for the historical model for patenting.  On top of that minor point, there is the larger point of "trade secret" which is not mentioned in the media.  Even in the age of patenting in America, trade secrets had a major presence.  A TS is like a patent except that you keep your IP secure yourself.  Obviously this is best achieved with mfg processes instead of what's inherently in the finished product.

So ... "technological progress" is not wholly dependent upon Big R&D, and neither is it wholly dependent upon patenting.  Those things are now important for how fast technological progress goes, but without them we wouldn't be left adrift.

Now, getting RID of patenting is not a good solution since the base agreement of patents is the same:  "Mr Inventor, tell the public all about your invention, and we'll grant you a solid monopoly on marketing it for a fairly long period of time."  Patents are good for everyone, as long as corporations don't dominate the entire patenting process.  Since they do now, it's up to use as "We the People" to further regulate the patenting process to put a large block on corporate participation.

Alas, the word "regulate" is the Nigger-of-Washington today, so that's boffo for my statements.