Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

americunt soldiers = racist genocidal maniacs

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-12 10:43 ID:MIp4GnSn

from article at
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2758829.ece

...
Through a combination of gung-ho recklessness and criminal behaviour born of panic, a narrative emerges of an army that frequently commits acts of cold-blooded violence. A number of interviewees revealed that the military will attempt to frame innocent bystanders as insurgents, often after panicked American troops have fired into groups of unarmed Iraqis. The veterans said the troops involved would round up any survivors and accuse them of being in the resistance while planting Kalashnikov AK47 rifles beside corpses to make it appear that they had died in combat.
...
"I'll tell you the point where I really turned... [there was] this little, you know, pudgy little two-year-old child with the cute little pudgy legs and she has a bullet through her leg... An IED [improvised explosive device] went off, the gun-happy soldiers just started shooting anywhere and the baby got hit. And this baby looked at me... like asking me why. You know, 'Why do I have a bullet in my leg?'... I was just like, 'This is, this is it. This is ridiculous'."
...
Sgt Dougherty described her squad leader shooting an Iraqi civilian in the back in 2003. "The mentality of my squad leader was like, 'Oh, we have to kill them over here so I don't have to kill them back in Colorado'," she said. "He just seemed to view every Iraqi as a potential terrorist."
...
"[The photo] was very graphic... They open the body bags of these prisoners that were shot in the head and [one soldier has] got a spoon. He's reaching in to scoop out some of his brain, looking at the camera and smiling."
...
"A lot of guys really supported that whole concept that if they don't speak English and they have darker skin, they're not as human as us, so we can do what we want."
...

READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2758829.ece

From now until the end of my life, if I EVER meet any americunt that participated in this war, I WILL cave their fucking skull in.  I don't give a fuck about the consequences.  These fucking americunt asshole soldiers are worse than Nazi death-camp guards, and probably even stupider.  At this point, I think it's obvious who the REAL TERRORISTS on this earth are.

Retarded americunt soldiers AND supporters are an enemy of human decency and ought to all be disposed of in the harshest manner possible.  If one lives next door to you, run them over in the street with your car if you have to.  Poison their food, burn their house down, or even just take a bat to their skull.  Feel free to target their entire family while you're at it.  If you don't, one day they'll be pointing their gun at YOU.

Name: Thelema 2007-07-18 15:18 ID:9Jhdl6zr

I'm not the one that said this, but I'll explain on his behalf.

>Excuse me, third party here. What exactly do you consider an "honorable force among malevolent forces"? One that kills for a different reason? One that kills in a different way? One that kills less? More? Only when threatened? Maybe some of those would make a difference, but no matter how you look at it, it's still killing.

Sometimes killing may be the only alternative available, if someone kills for personal gain then it is deemed malevant, if someone kills out of protection then it is deemed honourable. Yes it is still killing but because it was out of protection he doesn't have the blame for it and he cannot be punished. Was it wrong for the gauls/celts to kill Romans? I wouldn't call such thing an atrocity either as both sides accepted it. As for who was on the 'good' side of the fighting, that depends on thier own ideals.

Honour? well, I believe in honour but I think it's more of a thing of respect and ka, so I may fight out of honour yes. I'm sorry to say this, but when I read that you said you were liberal and 'anti-war' I thought of you not knowing what the fuck war is about, especially as you call yourself 'anti-war'.

Yes, I am anti-war on an objective scale, but thier may be truthful occasions where I am 'pro-war' Because there are situations where thiis is viable. As for ending the conflict, well, that's not going to happen because each side has thier own ideals and priorities, we're not living in a liberal paradise.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List