Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Why is Sturmfaggotry so fallible

Name: SEAKING 2007-06-20 8:04 ID:bXGw+m+Y

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence. 
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

Name: Anonymouse 2007-07-29 10:28 ID:EjZuQgeb

word, G.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-29 19:57 ID:kV4TgJ/6

>>80
No its true. Otherwise, PICS or GTFO!

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 6:12 ID:ND5DxUUD

>>82
DNA can be used to tell who you are related to. gb2 bible camp

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 7:05 ID:Dy6wlf/E

>>83
Yes. But if i find a strand of hair at a crime scene i cant deduce from the genetic material what race the person came from (well, there are a difference in frequencies between peoples but its not very exact). gb2 school and lurk moar

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 7:11 ID:ND5DxUUD

>>84
You can deduce what race they are from. It is more difficult to deduce who someone is related to than it is to deduce which racial characteristics they possess. They can even deduce how mixed you are.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 7:44 ID:Dy6wlf/E

>>85
This is contrary to my understanding, PICS or GTFO?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 11:31 ID:ZSm7q6hI

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 12:33 ID:edFNA5qG

>>87

We have fucking been over this AGES ago. This is STILL sampling of a continuum. Objectively speaking there are no "race genes". The webpage doesn't even identify the scientific mechanism for acquiring this information. Might it be that's because there is no genetic mechanism for race in the first fucking place?

Name: RedCream 2007-07-30 13:04 ID:Jz+y2EU8

#88, are you saying racial characteristics are spread across the genome without reference to each other?  If so, then we'd have to more carefully think about larger and longer environmental selectors, right?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 13:24 ID:edFNA5qG

>>89

Why don't you re-read my post? How about you go to the link and check out those out-dated "Materials". I'm honestly sick of explaining this shit over and over again to pseudo-science racist-nerd faggot fucks. This is very, very, very simple science here.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 13:44 ID:ND5DxUUD

>>88
There are a number of genes only found within certain population groups, these give these groups characteristics not present in amongst the rest of the world. Characteristics such as a larger neo-cortex allowing intelligence above that of a savage ape-beast. Some races do not possess this characteristic.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 13:45 ID:Dy6wlf/E

Read this shit and get wise. Its sums up why evolutionary biologists have abandoned race as an description of an objectivly percievable phenomen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race#Race_and_Population_Genetics:_.22population.22_and_.22cline.22_as_alternatives

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-30 23:28 ID:Heaven

>>92
evolutionary biologists
objectively perceivable phenomenon
You've lost half your target audience with these big words.
On second thought, you might do better acting it out with puppets.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 16:32 ID:DIRPP1e7

>>92
>>93
You are claiming other people are stupid as you do not understand their counter-arguments. Cline is just a term to describe the gradual distribution of one trait, when races exist due to a group sharing distinct traits as a result of geography. People living along the Nile are a cline from negroid to arabic racial traits, this does not mean you cannot tell the difference between someone with ancestors native to Pakistan and someone with ancestors native to Zimbabwe. Race is still valid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cline_%28population_genetics%29
"This substitution of "cline" for "race" or "subspecies" is technically incorrect because the word "cline" refers only to the geographic density gradient of a single feature, while the words "race," "subspecies," etc., assume replicable clusters of features. On the other hand, using the term "cline" in substitution for "race" may be appropriate if the speaker understands racial distinctions more in terms of groupable variations on a continuum. In line with the example above from linguistics, human skin color may be described in terms of the following cline: "white", "cream","olive", "tan", "brown", "black", et cetera with a myriad intermediates. Because of the controversies over the term "race", the term "cline" may be much more of an accurate description."

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 2:21 ID:NxJQsKCm

>>94

Race isn't valid just because you think the word "Cline" is open to interpretation. I'm thinking that maybe you didn't read the whole article because you only offered a semantical counter-argument to an assertion made by people who are, quite frankly, superior to you in intelligence. Get back to us when you can craft a core thesis statement that refutes the fact that   the historical concept of race is rooted in nothing but illogical and non-objective fallacy.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 4:04 ID:KaqyO0xU

There are differences.
Although genetic differences are small, remember we have 98% the same DNA as a Chimp. Breeds of dog are the closest thing to human races. Regardless of proving the genetics of it.

Black people have average lower IQ's, different skull and other bone shapes, and are ugly. Why would I want to breed or live with dumb ugly people? I don't care if u can argue they may not be genetically inferior, there's no reason why that alone would make me want to live with them.

There are many differences between the races, epicanthal eye fold, skull shapes average IQ etc. You can argue there's no genetic difference but that screams of bullshit. Different races had different environmental selection pressures. Africans adapted to the jungle and plains of Africa, where brute strength, violence and a tribal mentality were an effective survival strategy.
In Europe and the deserts of the middle east and Asia different survival skills were needed. Collective working together and forward planning were necessary to survive a cold winter of a desert summer.
There's no way those different pressures wouldn't have had some effect on the Genes of a people, even if our genetic understanding isn't good enough to prove differences.

At the end of the day though, why should I want to live alongside people I find ugly, and stupid. Why should I want to undo thousands of years of evolution and breed outside my own race and culture. Even if we are equal genetically there's no reason for me to want any of that.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 6:02 ID:NxJQsKCm

>>96

Fuck you.

Listen: If you don't care about the fact that race as a concept has no foundation in objective science or no empirical basis for it's existence, then that's fine. As long as you don't care: Be racist.

But don't try to serve up your shitty pseudo science to the rest of us as a valid reason for your bigotry...your post should have looked like this:

Black people have average lower IQ's, different skull and other bone shapes, and are ugly. Why would I want to breed or live with dumb ugly people? I don't care if u can argue they may not be genetically inferior, there's no reason why that alone would make me want to live with them.

There are many differences between the races, epicanthal eye fold, skull shapes average IQ etc. You can argue there's no genetic difference but that screams of bullshit. Different races had different environmental selection pressures. Africans adapted to the jungle and plains of Africa, where brute strength, violence and a tribal mentality were an effective survival strategy.
In Europe and the deserts of the middle east and Asia different survival skills were needed. Collective working together and forward planning were necessary to survive a cold winter of a desert summer.


There's no way those different pressures wouldn't have had some effect on the Genes of a people, even if our genetic understanding isn't good enough to prove differences.

At the end of the day though, why should I want to live alongside people I find ugly, and stupid. Why should I want to  thousands of years of evolution and breed outside my own race and culture. Even if we are equal genetically there's no reason for me to want any of that.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 9:17 ID:CFS9YCeR

>>95
"Race isn't valid just because you think the word "Cline" is open to interpretation."
My argument could not be more straightforward. I am using the only definition of cline possible.

Biology. the gradual change in certain characteristics exhibited by members of a series of adjacent populations of organisms of the same species.

It is a steady change in the frequency of a single gene from one population to the next with no clear boundaries. This does not occur with many genes which are extremely frequent in certain native populations and minutely frequent in nearby populations. There are native groups who are members of a cline, but only because they exist on a geographical bottle neck between 2 distinct racial groups who's population far exceeds their own. Also these genes do have an effect on more than appearance.

The sooner people are less paranoid about racism and see the benefits of ensuring your children are healthier and happier the better. I know a black woman who wants to give birth to an embryo of a blonde blue eyed white child and raise it as her own, she has been persecuted and villified by all her liberal friends who believe she is betraying her race or whatever. Who are the real racists I wonder?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 13:03 ID:DwwywWEG

if anyone takes the bell curve seriously they don't have a fucking clue

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 16:06 ID:NxJQsKCm

>>98

Shut the fuck up, faggot. You don't know any such woman and it would still take a good 3 post to convince you that you're completely full of shit. The first two will go over your head and the final one will just result in your spamming "NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER" throughout the entire thread.

The real racist are people like YOU who think skin color or culture will make anyone more or less happy. Stupid rich drunk white bitches like Lohan are just as confused and fucked up as the rest of us and so are you and whites and blacks and asians and whoever else.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 17:06 ID:4X2eWJ5S

You forgot the mexicans.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-02 19:31 ID:gmPKYuUx

in ur anon, tryin out ur freds.

in lulz we trust

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-03 15:12 ID:/TdXB2wE

>>100
NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-03 18:32 ID:JVudhlKM

>>100
NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 21:04 ID:6p8b/anM

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence.
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 21:22 ID:DoKFCm2n

>>105
I think you made some of those words up. Not that it would matter to the successful, non-religious, well-educated racist.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-25 10:33 ID:vkmoEp5f

fgsfds

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-25 10:35 ID:vkmoEp5f

fgsfds

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List