Why is Sturmfaggotry so fallible

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence. 
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

Yeah, and that's another thing, chanfag:  a constitutional monarchy has differences from a democratic republic.  The European Model includes the concept of the power of a monarch.  True, it's not like (for example) the BritQueen would dare to fail to approve a new government under "her" Prime Minister.  Yet, she could if she wanted to.  Is it just a paperwork issue?  If so, why not flush the monarchies right the fuck out of Europe?  I believe it's not done since the concept of the authority of a monarch simmers in the background of the European Model.

For some reason, you chanfags love to suck the extreme fail of not recognizing the scale of things.  "Shoot the leader" only concerns ONE PERSON, and few people issue threats against that person.  In addition, that person is well protected; he's the last person we should ever seriously worry about when it comes to threats of violence.  However, the "nigras and joos" are individuals in the millions, and are not surrounded 24/7 by crack security teams.  By illegalizing saying bad things about them, Sweden has suppressed far more people and far more liberty.

The point I continue to make is that you don't have the same level of freedom of speech as you do in America.  Yes, there are exceptions, such as the European Model being far more tolerant of spontaneous demonstrations, yet overall America scores higher on the scale of the MOST liberty for the MOST people.  That's the American Model ... which is being whittled down decade by decade, unfortunately.

Look, could you honor a request?  It's a little one and it won't be too painful for you.  Could you?  OK, here it is:

PLEASE COME UP WITH AN ARGUMENT THAT CAN'T BE KNOCKED DOWN IN LESS THAN 30 SECONDS BY AN 8-YR-OLD HOPPED UP ON PERCODAN?

That's it.  Thanks for listening.