Why is Sturmfaggotry so fallible

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence. 
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

#63, if that's your definition of thought control, then any government enacts it.  Isn't that a rather pointless point since it brooks no comparisons between current governments?

In Europe, it's fairly common to have a law that illegalizes perfectly sane and calm speech that threatens no one.  That just doesn't happen in America except for the "shoot the President" stuff (which arguably threatens somebody even if they well deserve it).

Burning a dollar bill isn't "speech".  You're destroying government property that we citizens have every right to demand is protected.  Note well that burning a flag is legal expression since it's your own flag, buddy -- you should be able to do what you want with it.  (Note well that America's rightwingnuts want to CODIFY that in the law (the US Constitution, no less!) as illegal.  That's why sensible men despise the right wing, and why despicable men BECOME the right wing.)

If you think burning money is "speech" and you can "express" by destroying it, then you may as well say burning the local post office during a riot is ALSO speech that somehow deserves protection under the US Constitution.  (The wise judge should still toss out any case brought before him for "burning a dollar bill" since it's just a fucking dollar.  Gimme a break!)