Why is Sturmfaggotry so fallible

Why is racism made of fail? Well, this may seem self-evident but to all under&ge channers out there yet to grow a clue i will here present a list of what puts the fag in sturmfagism
1) Racism. Race is an arbitrary concept at best. Theres no genetic race, i.e. one cannot see in the DNA what race someone belongs to, and there is bigger genetic difference between two breeds of dogs than there are between an south african and an inuit. Also, all the iq tests and whatnot, when one does any statistical test that compares two groups its highly unlikely that the groups will get the same score, its just an effect of stochastic sampling, i.e. if i´d test the iq of long vs short people id find one to be smarter than the other just because of coincidence. 
2) Scapegoatism. One is a failure at life but one is such a big pussy that one needs to blame somebody else. Buhu, i lost ma jaob, nao i haet mejico. This is real faggotry unbecoming anyone who has a clue.
3) Toolism. Since racists are so angry at all those who causes their problems they are ever ready to become tools to any cynical force that need idiots by the hundreds. Examples are any church, US army, any org that sells shit (Ku Klux Klan, Stormfront etc) like music or t-shirts.
4) Idiotism. Since the safety blanket of racism is a brittle veil at best education must never enter the racists mind, else it must face its own failures at life. This also includes suspecting the media being controlled by some other force than profitability, the schools and univeristies in the hands of jewish niggerloving pinkos etc. Its like believing one is living in the matrix, nothing and noone can be trusted, one self is very special because of what color one was born of.

#42, the European Model is perfectly a valid entity or characteristic, for the reasons I stated.  It's you who has to admit something.  You need to pick a point and disprove it.  You've failed to do so.  Your Canada/Australia examples, I must say, are fairly laughable.  Any credible thinker can link those nations socially to Europe.  So, I can only conclude that you're being defensive about Europe.  That doesn't serve our discussion, and if you don't stop that, I'm going to destroy you even more roughly than I've done already.

Anyway, onward.  Why on Earth do you think "[H]ypercapitalism is on a fucking decline"?  China is an example of Hypercapitalism!  It's the pursuit of profits over all other social costs.

In the USA, with such a mature economy, Hypercapitalism hasn't resulted in Chinese levels of growth.  It's resulted in the destruction of the middle class as well as the enrichment of the already staggeringly-rich class.  That's what Hypercapitalism does, too:  concentrates wealth.  It doesn't have to create more wealth before it concentrates it.  If it has its way in the USA, a very small group of people (less than 1000) will end up owning NEARLY EVERYTHING in the United States ... all on the strength of what some paper in a bank vault says.  They will live like gods.  The 300 million others will work for those 1000 in some fashion.  The top 1000000 of the workers will live quite well indeed, with mansions, servants, fleets of cars, and immunity to prosecution ... but they will only own what they own as a matter of the sufferance of the top 1000.  The next 10 million or so will live well enough, like the 1980s middle class, but they will be very dependent on following the orders of the top million to the letter, or they will be replaced from below in a heartbeat.  This 10 million will "keep the peace", meaning they will be the soldiers and managers who directly shoot and fire people, to keep the vast and poor masses in their place.

The bottom 290 million or so will be various shades of poor, largely living in shanty towns, desperate to obtain work from the top 10M (or so), the "elite", so they can get a little money to fight sickness or feed or educate (not both) their malnourished children so they can either have better health or better jobs from the elite.

Does THAT model look familiar?  Yes, it's the Imperial Model, as expressed in the modern age of well-defined Capitalism, modified by Hypercapitalism.  Everything will be owned, and armed classes exist to enforce those claims of ownership.  It will not be like prior ages when all you had to do is seize land and farm it in order to ward off starvation; in modern America, all the land is owned, and the owners can strongly enforce their lands claims.

Now, onto the European Model of overly limiting the freedom of speech.  You reference Sweden, yet try to wriggle out of it all by saying there are loopholes.  Those don't deny the truth of my statement; the base laws only make it true.  There is no chance whatsoever of being convicted in America of "thoughtcrime".  In Sweden -- your alleged divergent nation from the "European Model of Antispeech" -- however, there is.  You only made my case for me.

And the case is this:  In the European Model of social organization, there TENDS TO BE (note the words) laws against freedom of speech.  For what you can freely and commonly say in America, you are liable for in Europe, IN GENERAL (again, note the words).