>>53
1) Agnostics are not scientific minded. In science something has to be proven to be taken for truth. As long as it is not proven it is not true, ie ufos are assumed not to exist, stargate sg01 is assumed NOT to be a accurate depiction of ancient egypt, the loch ness monster is assumed not to exist etc. God is assumed not to exist, plus there is no need for him anyway, there is yet a question that cant be answered by anything other than a diety of any form. Agnostics are liek 10 year old wannabe philosophers with no real problems to solve who invent soemthing that makes them interesting. Well, you fail at life.
2) Libertarians are not scientific minded because they neglect every empirical fact that does not support their position (which is a safe non-position to start with) and creates strawmen out of everything else. While agnosticism is some nerds way to seem interesting libertarianism is the political idiots way to seem to have a catch-all solution. In complex systems there are never any easy answers, something that is true in one part is not true in another etc and simple principle-politics does not apply to human modern society. But since the libertarian will take any critisism as over intellectualisation from right wing well fare socialist nazis the point is moot. Try to convince your dog that a cat is fine too, that will be easier.