Jews Blocking N. Finkelstein's Tenure

There are Jews such as Alan Dershowitz who don't want dissenters of Israel to have a say in American politics. One of those detractors, Norman Finkelstein is in a battle of tenure because Dershowitz is influencing DePaul University into not allowing him tenure at all. Why do Jews hate Jews who disagree with Israel?

http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/

Dershowitz is crazy.  He'll defend torture if it's used on an Arab who doesn't share the same views he does.

Douchowitz also defended O.J. Simpson.

>>1-3
ITT Sturmfrunt fag that uses the voices of reasonable people to try and lend credence to their worldview; Under which those same people are somehow genetically/culturally inferior.

Stormfronties makes me ashamed of being white...

>>4

ITT Zionfag that uses abject lack of reason and ad hominem attacks to try and lend credence to their worldview, Under which those same people should have the right to kill any Arab they please.

>>5

Legitimate criticism of Israel is not Anti-Semitism.

>>6
I completly agree, just stated my opinion about stormys. Im as ardently anti-racist as i am anti-zionist (or rather, i see zionism as a racist ideology). 

>>6
Just go back to fucking your sister already, hick.

>>8

Again, ad hominem is all Zionists can do to circumvent discussing the human rights violations of The State of Israel.

>>9
FAGGOT

>>10

The invasion itself is a serious breach of international law, and major war crimes are being committed as it proceeds. There is no legal justification.

The "moral justification" is supposed to be that capturing soldiers in a cross-border raid, and killing others, is an outrageous crime. We know, for certain, that Israel, the United States and other Western governments, as well as the mainstream of articulate Western opinion, do not believe a word of that. Sufficient evidence is their tolerance for many years of US-backed Israeli crimes in Lebanon, including four invasions before this one, occupation in violation of Security Council orders for 22 years, and regular killings and abductions. To mention just one question that every journal should be answering: When did Nasrallah assume a leadership role? Answer: When the Rabin government escalated its crimes in Lebanon, murdering Sheikh Abbas Mussawi and his wife and child with missiles fired from a US helicopter. Nasrallah was chosen as his successor. Only one of innumerable cases. There is, after all, a good reason why last February, 70% of Lebanese called for the capture of Israeli soldiers for prisoner exchange.

The conclusion is underscored, dramatically, by the current upsurge of violence, which began after the capture of Corporal Gilad Shalit on June 25. Every published Western "timeline" takes that as the opening event. Yet the day before, Israeli forces kidnapped two Gaza civilians, a doctor and his brother, and sent them to the Israeli prison system where they can join innumerable other Palestinians, many held without charges -- hence kidnapped. Kidnapping of civilians is a far worse crime than capture of soldiers. The Western response was quite revealing: a few casual comments, otherwise silence. The major media did not even bother reporting it. That fact alone demonstrates, with brutal clarity, that there is no moral justification for the sharp escalation of attacks in Gaza or the destruction of Lebanon, and that the Western show of outrage about kidnapping is cynical fraud.

Much has been said about Israel's right to defend itself from its enemies who are taking advantage of Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, thus causing the latest chapter in the Arab-Israeli conflict. Do you agree?

Israel certainly has a right to defend itself, but no state has the right to "defend" occupied territories. When the World Court condemned Israel's "separation wall," even a US Justice, Judge Buergenthal, declared that any part of it built to defend Israeli settlements is "ipso facto in violation of international humanitarian law," because the settlements themselves are illegal.

The withdrawal of a few thousand illegal settlers from Gaza was publicly announced as a West Bank expansion plan. It has now been formalized by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, with the support of Washington, as a program of annexation of valuable occupied lands and major resources (particularly water) and cantonization of the remaining territories, virtually separated from one another and from whatever pitiful piece of Jerusalem will be granted to Palestinians. All are to be imprisoned, since Israel is to take over the Jordan valley. Gaza, too, remains imprisoned and Israel carries out attacks there at will.

Gaza and the West Bank are recognized to be a unit, by the United States and Israel as well. Therefore, Israel still occupies Gaza, and cannot claim self-defense in territories it occupies in either of the two parts of Palestine. It is Israel and the United States that are radically violating international law. They are now seeking to consummate long-standing plans to eliminate Palestinian national rights for good.

The United States has refused to call for an immediate cease-fire, arguing that this would mean a return to the status quo ante, yet we are witnessing a "back to the past" re-occupation of parts of Lebanon, and Lebanon's rapid decline to political chaos by the current conflict. Is the US policy correct?

NC: It is correct from the point of view of those who want to ensure that Israel, by now virtually an offshore US military base and high-tech center, dominates the region, without any challenge to its rule as it proceeds to destroy Palestine. And there are side advantages, such as eliminating any Lebanese-based deterrent if US-Israel decide to attack Iran.

They may also hope to set up a client regime in Lebanon of the kind that Ariel Sharon sought to create when he invaded Lebanon in 1982, destroying much of the country and killing some 15-20,000 people.

>>10

Not your Goyim.

>>11-13
FAGGOT

>>14

Go make your Right of Return and further the racist apartheid.

>>15
FAGGOT

>>16
FAGGOT
>>17
FAGGOT
>>18
FAGGOT

Disregard that, I suck multi-cock.>>14
>>15
>>16
>>17
>>10
>>4

>>18
FAGGOT

>>19

NameFAGGOT

>>19
Disregard that, I suck cocks.

The guy below sucks more cocks, though:

>>21

Disregard cocks, I suck that

>>1
Simply cos they aren't Jews. They're Zionists.

the AIDS virus was invented by the CIA to exterminate a certain race

You're giving the CIA a lot of credit...

Jewpanese

>>23
Zionist is the codeword for Jew among Sturmfags.

Really makes those critical of Israel look bad when Neo-Nazis and Neo-Nazi rejects associate themselves with the same cause.