Why is libertarianism so infallible?

It is due to it being the application of political science. It does not permit failed policies to be continued fruitlessly year after year with idealistic fervour, it is next to impossible for anyone surrounded by fierce libertarian critics to continue clinging on to lies. It is a purely functional machine, lubricated with justice and fueled by free speech.

>>920
Immediately after 999GET, I'm going to start that thread, pusface.

Be my guest you tool.

>>922
You've got it.  Look forward to that thread, cumduck.

>>920
if you hadn't said it, no one would have given a fuck, but hey, thanks a lot faggot, now we'll have another hundred posts by a retard claiming hitler was communist and several other idiots seriously replying to it.

>>924
Yeh, that's right -- blame that >>920 fucker.  Now this thread will be resurrected once 999GET happens.  Look forward to MOAR months of this festering shit.  Blame yourselves for tempting a demon.  Don't taunt Happy Fun Ball!  How many times have you turds been schooled on that, anyway?  HOW!  MANY!  TIMES!

That's all I've got to say on the matter (at least until 999GET, that is).

>>925
Shut up, Jew.

Quick! No one reply! Only then will he go away!

>>927
Too late.  And it's 928GET, nao.  Oops!

929GET!  The GETs just keep GETting GETter, don't they?

>>929
that's cheating

>>39
game theory = duh i don't get politics i'm just gonna resort to my most basic understanding of human nature from what i learned in the playground

>>931

If you know game theory you also know the prisoners dilemma.  Now shut up!

>>931
I see that your inability to respond to recent arguments has forced you all the way back there, nice.

...

>>933
If you look clearly you will see that all criticism has already been responded to.

I've laughed hard and long at all the resistance that Libertarianism has received on this fagboard.  A lot of people are afraid of the base design of the American Republic.

So, we've got to get to 1000GET, folks, so I can restart this thread.  Only 63 more entries to go.  DO IT.

>>935
Yeah, like BAWWWWWWWWWWWW BUSH IS COMMUNIST BAWWW THAT IS MY RETARDED DEFINITION SO IT MUST BE TRUE BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, yeah, real intelligent these libertarians are...

Calling people you don't like communist is so 80's.

Now you should call them muslim.

   I think that obama and hi pastor only showed how racist he was and other I quote "niggers" as i believe they call themselves nowadays.Also how we supposed "white people" put the black man down

We must reserve the right to bomb niggers

I would advise you all to read the novel Sphere by Michael Crichton.  Or rather, here's the ending.  Everyone must stop thinking about giant squids.  Everyone must stop thinking about how their thoughts create things.  Everyone must stop about thinking.  Stop thinking about thinking.  Once everyone stops thinking at once, the threat is no longer present.  Or is it? No, it's not.  Now stop.  On the count of three. One. Two. Three.

>>941
>Micheal Crichton
kill yourself.

943GET.  Only 56 MOAR POASTEENZ until I can restart this fuckthread.  Oh, joy.  Oh, frabjous day!

>>943
no one cares HEY LOOK ONE MORE POST, AWESOME, RIGHT!??

>>944
Awesome iz RITE!  One moar poast ahcheevd.  An dats 945GET, me brudder!  FIDDY FOAR MOAR!

Keep bumping this thread, shitsauce.  You're only helping me.  And if you don't?  Fuck, I'll BUMP IT MYSELF.  So my plan will still work.  You're POWERLESS to stop me.  I'm going to WIN, and that's a WINNY kind of WIN ... a WINFUL WIN, a WINNING WIN, a WINSOME WIN.

I am too powerful for you.  You cannot succeed.  And why is that?  Because fucking Libertarianism is fucking infallible.

>>945
We have established that libertarianism is as infallible as Bush is communist.

Also, OH MY GOD, DID I BUMP IT!?? DID I MAKE ANOTHER POST!?? I DIDN'T REALIZE IT ONE BIT, I GUESS THE REFERENCE ABOUT NO ONE GIVING A SHIT, AND THE "HEY LOOK ONE MORE POST" WAS REFERRING TO SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT

I'm not going to bump this.

FIDDY TU MOAR!  I'm pwning you jerkoffs all over this bitch.

And Libertarianism's infallibility has a self-contained truth that has no connection to the Emperor.  People should be allowed to do their own thing without constantly resorting to using the power of government.  People like to harp on the monopoly issue, but in fact those monopolies depend upon government itself to secure their positions.  One of the root causes is how government tries to secure property "rights" to an extent that far exceeds what one many ought to own.  If a man can't defend his property -- much less work it -- he should not "own" such an expanse.  Government allows such huge accumulations of wealth to be centralized under the power of ONE MAN.  Kill that government protection process, then you kill those concentrations of power, hence you kill those monopolies.  The man who dares to build too big will lose control of his own creation, which is natural and right -- as power will spread along with a slumping pile of resources, and more people will naturally take up those resources and put them to use as they deem fit.

Libertarianism is the great missing element in the US today.  All the worthless jellyspines are afraid of what it means.  It means great liberty for all, and then a natural limit is reached for all.  No kings, no serfs ... any who fall into those categories will merit their standing.  The kings would only be able to use persuasion, since any of his bodyguards would be able to kill him otherwise.  And the serfs would only have themselves to blame for their slavery, since they could just leave the area and seize excess resources for themselves.

It'll all work out -- in the world that Libertarianism can build.  Sure, a few eggs would break at first in order to serve up so many delicious omelets, but those will all be eggs that deserve to break as the system changes.

(Now I've so severely scared all you yuppie pieces of shit, that you're busily copying this posting to report@homelandsecurity.gov.  You sick fucks really can't do anything for yourselves, can you?  You need Big Daddy Government to come along and rape you for at least half your wealth, just to fund it to make sure people like me don't live in your heavily-mortgaged neighborhoods.)

>>948
tl;dr

>>948
>Libertarianism
>No kings no serfs
oh god, oh god, they can't be this nearsighted and stupid can they? oy vey

>>950
lrn2read  Once you get Big Daddy Government to STOP protecting the properties of wealthy men, those men will have to stop RULING their fellow men (under the auspices of state-sponsored violence) and will have to start PERSUADING them.  The king-serf trend will be become anemic.

P.S.  FOARTEE ATE MOAR.  I'm restartin' this bitch like a muthafucka.

>>951
lol what state sponsored violence? The last time people were hosed down in the streets was the 60s and that was during a time when Communism was a real threat, so it was understandable.

>>952
The violence the state will perform on your behalf when you use the courts and police to secure your excessive rights to far more property than you should own.  The implied use of force is still force, dipshit.

All law is secured through the use of force, or its implication.  Such force can be considered violence.  At any rate, it's an intimidation against your natural right to seize assets that you can personally control.

No wonder you post anonymously.  You're so stupid or uneducated that you must sense the embarrassment you're liable for, in spouting off your childish nonsense.

>>953
COMMUNIST

>>954
I have to agree.

RedCream, You really are starting to sound like some butthurt lib whose pissed off because he doesn't have as much as his neighbor.
You're sounding very anti-private property.

>>955
It's funny because that was the first time he said something right.

>>951
lern2anarcho-capitalism

>>956
Butthurt lib whose pissed off because he doesn't have as much as his neighbor.

>>958
retard alert

>>955
You should learn to read.  I'm actually sounding very:

anti-private-too-much-property-for-any-one-person-to-own

We used to have a minimum of government with focused regulations that could at least address this great problem.  But we exchanged that for a HUGE government that does ZERO regulation of the excesses of wealth.

If my neighbor first wants to have more than I do, he should not demand that the government realign all social policy to support what he does to get that wealth.  In short, we should not run the society only for the rich.  If you keep that up, civil war is the only result.

P.S.  THURDEE NYN MOAR.