>>825
AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
Not only you don't know what socialism is, (hello, state capitalism), you also don't know what Keynesian Economics is, like I stated in the other post and you went on all the way to prove your ignorance and humiliate yourself once again. I suggest you to at least bother to google before you make such retarded statements. We are discussing the macroeconomic portion of Keynesian theories, which suggests that gold/silver capital too plays a part in a nations' wealth, which is seen as a model which re-introduces portions from the disproved notion of Mercantilism. But, before everything, this discussion is irrelevant because the point was that according to ANY valid macroeconomic theory your dim interpretation of the neo-sheep herding ideology, Libertarianism, is wrong.
See, you can't do much without knowing shit and just spouting back the bullshit that was fed to you. Good day and enjoy your fail.