Why is libertarianism so infallible?

It is due to it being the application of political science. It does not permit failed policies to be continued fruitlessly year after year with idealistic fervour, it is next to impossible for anyone surrounded by fierce libertarian critics to continue clinging on to lies. It is a purely functional machine, lubricated with justice and fueled by free speech.

Liberals at least don't play by means of stupid fantasies everyone mature enough stoped believing in after the age of 12

>>521

lol n1

>>521
Liberals believe in confiscating money and property, especially from the wealthy.  Anyone over the age of 12 knows that that can't work.

Liberals believe in confiscating guns from Americans.  Again, anyone over 12 knows that can't work, either.

It looks like I just took a steamy shit in your mouth, dumbassed anon!

Does any dumbassed Liberal care to counter what I said?  Since it's all true, it would fairly amusing to hear your sheep-like bleating to the contrary.

I'm a liberal so I'll take the bait:

'waaaahhhh red cream is racists, racists on teh intranets wahhhh!'
'i hate myself cause I'm white I suck jew cock wahhhhhh'

USA, land of binary politics

I'm taking a shit into your thread -- huuuuuh pffarplfshhhhh farP! splash

>>518
Why is the assumption that anyone within the boundaries of that theocracy going to be forced to convert? Much rather they would leave of their own volition, provided the theocracy would allow them to.

>>523

You have no idea what your talking about. Libertarians wanting to take money and guns from people that is in fact the opposite of what we want. God your fucking retarded. I hate you.

>>527
If they don't force people to convert they will still exercise power which is not directly represented by the populace. The only conceivable situation where there would be no frictions is if they relinquish their power to the point where their position is only symbolic like the British Queen.

Under a libertarianism you have the economic freedoms to become a millionaire before you are 35. Anything else and you will be a wage slave the rest of your life.

>>530

They don't understand wealth accumulation principles (Libertarians).

To them, there is nothing wrong with a family having billions upon billions to control sectors of the economy.

Joe the Ragman who was born in poverty has a chance to become a millionaire in a Libertarian Utopia but don't kid yourself he has an equal chance to those who own the means of production.

Yes, I am a Marxist.

Marx was a jew, communism was a jewish conspiracy to rule Europe and America created by jews, with the end result being jews pulling the strings being the ruiling class and everyone else as their slave.

>>532
sorry to break it to you but  jews dont hold a single collective consciousness, they ar not the borg.

>>533
Sorry to break it to you, but Jews have a very insular and iconic culture.  No, it's not the Borg, but it's about as close to the Borg as Humans can get.

Spread your lies somewhere else, Jew Apologist.

>>534
But it's still not the borg so you need to be more realistic before claiming "LOL JEWS".

But there are Jews who don't have a group mentality.  The Jews who do their Hebrew magics and get wasted on holidays and follow all their traditions and have a meager income.  There are plenty of innocent Jews who have nothing to do with the Jews in power.  Just like the average Christian isn't the same as the richest televangelists of the Christian Right.

>>535
Bother to read, Jewsucker!  I was entirely realistic when I noted their culture is significantly insular and iconic.  Hence, it's entirely rational to say "LOLJOOS".

>>536
The Jews are a lot tighter than Christians.  You also picked a bad example since it only proves my point ... since the Christians in their millions in the USA condone the West's general attack upon Islam.  You hardly need to be a card-carrying member of the Christian Right in order to partake of the huge problem in the world that is posed by Christianity.  Christianity is behind most of the world's evangelical crusades, with the balance made up with Islam.  And you know what?  JEWS ARE EVEN WORSE.  If the Jews were about x10 more numerous, we'd have a World War constantly, and extensive slavery in the First and Second Worlds.

Idiot . Jews may be as "borg" as humans can get but they are still not borg so your conspiracies are still unrealistic. "lol jew" somewhere else.

Try here.
www.stormfront.org

>>538
Thank you for admitting Jews are as Borg as Humans can get.  That was my entire point and you support it.  I can't ask for greater support than that.

And NO ONE here mentioned "conspiracy" except YOU!  Troll some boards with teenagers on them.

You shitbitches act as if your words aren't RIGHT THERE on the screen, pwning yourselves instantly.  Sheesh.

....."five Jews, six opinions"....that's a cliche among Jews....

>>539
1. (used to express possibility): It may rain.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/may

Possibility can lie anywhere between impossibility and uncertainty. Therefore I did not admit "JEW IS BORG OMG I WATCH STAR TREK SO MUCH I'LL NEVER HAVE TEH GEI BUTT SECHS WITH SPOK WAAH" like you.

>>540
Where did the sixth opinion come from?

hm

RedCream is a dumbass

The recent sub-prime mortgage crisis proves the state cannot run an economy.

>>545

That's the product of lenders and the failings of the "free market."

at first i was against this thread cause its the same three faggots over and over but then I saw it was right next to the "Nigger Woman Shits on Public Sidewalk" thread and i thought, oh well, if the retarded, paradoxical lack of thought that is the libertarian movement has a place, it's right here.

>>546
Only lenders too stupid to realise the government was adulterring interest rates.

>>547
Under a libertarianism you would be free to shit on the sidewalk, provided the sidewalk is your property.

>>549
And your problem with that is?

>>550
I don't have any problem. I'm just pointing it out.

>>551
Without libertarianism I'm forced to pay for undeserving niggers. Just pointing that out too.

>>552
Then I would like to point out that you would also not be paying for undeserving whites aswell.

>>549
FYI, sidewalks would get bought out by holding firms and millionaires, and you'd have to pay a toll to walk on them. Shitting on the sidewalk would be against the rules that the owner applies, and if you did so, you would be punished by Securicorp because you agreed to those terms in your contract.

>>552
Yeah, your life would be a lot better if there was no safety net at all in society, I'm sure.

>>554
There are such safety nets, they are called dividends and people to stupid to obtain them are stupid.

>>554

This right here is the correct depiction of Libertarianism.

>>554
>>556
Here you are tapping away at a machine of complexity beyond the point the human mind can comprehend which required the innovation and creativity of teams of elite scientists for decades to create and you believe that the only way for the invisible hand to fund sidewalks is by setting up toll booths every stretch of concrete!

Don't worry. I'll do the thinking for you by utilising my superb business analyst skills to provide a glimpse into the sophisticated road market of the libertarian future!

Toll booths are expensive and obstructive, eventually retardcorp would have given up the enterprise and put the roads and sidewalks up for sale relative to their value. The following arrangements would occur to determine how it is all paid for in ascending order of complexity.

Property.
There is only 1 user dependant on the road in front of their home and they own it.

Contract.
There are many cooperative users and a contract was able to be agreed apon to collectively own the road. Roads tend to be tied to assets and influence land values thus close knit communities, real estate developpers and land owners could easily make a contract as simple as "you own this building, you pitch in for road maintenance".

Negotiating firm.
There are many uncooperative users with different needs, there are competing roads and there is no realistic way of them negotiating a way to form a contract on their own, thus a firm provides this service for them by uniting the negotiating power of those dependant enough on the road to agree to contribute a source of payment for road owners. Negotiating firms would cut off road owners who set up expensive toll booths or do not repair their road properly and may even buy up roads themselves, whilst at the same time rewarding road owners who attract more dependant users. Negotiating firms may well also buy up roads and perform the service of generating contracts and tying them to property as described in the above paragraph. Also after the market begins to heat up, competing NFs would attempt to expand their clients by attempting to less important demographics such as average family car users. They may well manage to gain small donations from 1000s of average family car users in an area in order to pay for easier access to a supermarket or something in that order.

oop sorry

After the NF market begins to heat up, competing NFs would attempt to expand their profits by providing services to less dependant demographics such as average family car users. They may well manage to gain small donations from 1000s of average family car users in an area in order to pay for easier access to a supermarket or something in that order. NFs of this sort can easily replace most government functions.

Well that settles it.

If only human nature and the resulting market forces were that predictable...