>>452
IF! there was a free market unions couldn't exist unless they were world-wide, and as
>>451 said, people would simply hire non-unionists. Unions skewer the market because they artificially raise the minimum wage some workers are willing to work for, then it doesn't matter how they do it.
spoiler: a very little percentage of opened businesses make it big. Alot of them go bankrupt. You know what happens if you go bankrupt in libertarianland? you most likely never have a chance to do anything again. You'll have no credit rating. No way to get some of your loan removed, you'll have to do whatever job you can and pay off on your loan which is probably of a magnitude so that you'll be working for the rest of your life to pay off the loan.
That doesn't really sound like a situation i'd ever risk ending up in.
Different areas of the world will always have different advantages. Saying you wouldn't have to import food in a free market situation is pretty silly, unless you want to restrict the kind of foods sold to those being produced in the US, and that's not very free market is it.
"It may put me at a disadvantage having to compete with more people, but this only provides me with motivation to improve myself which would concern my superiors making them more efficient to prove they are worth their salary."
it's a dog-eat-dog world out there isn't it. No thx i think i'll pass on libertarianland so far.