>>352
Your points don't stand, because they're completely disjointed from reality. For example, you say that prioritizing "quality of life" leads to fascism, and then you back that up with some inarticulate nonsense. Being just wrong isn't enough, though: you call for "free men" to bring a violent end to institutions vital to American economy, education, and even liberty.
Then you go on to say how important it is for everyone to know the difference between money and wealth, and how that is the difference between the libertarian utopia and hyper-capitalist ruin (as in Africa). That would be a really compelling philosophy, if you bothered to even try to explain why someone would believe this kind of nonsense. Instead, you leave it as fact, apparently because you've already decided that everyone who doesn't automatically agree with you is a lib'ral commie traitor.
Am I a 'yuppie' for consuming the 'propaganda' that allows me to communicate in such a way that I can have some chance of swaying a normal person's opinion? Really, go read "The Road to Serfdom" by F.A. Hayek. He was an anti-socialist who you would agree with on many issues, but instead of grabbing nonsense out of a deranged fantasy world, his book contains logic and reason. It really is a compelling work, but unfortunately you're too anti-book-learnin' to bother to get out of your chair to get it (or is it that the presence of another human mind in this world is too threatening to you?).