>>302
See, this is what I love about libertarianism. If someone can show that it's shit, it can just be changed at whim to suit whatever position you want to take. Now, you've gone and confused anti-federalism with libertarianism. Good job. Let's sum up what we have for your libertarian utopia so far:
1. Power goes to the states, which means that in Florida an abortion doctor will go to jail for ten years, while in California tax dollars are used to give free abortions to illegal immigrants. Marijuana possession earns you a death penalty in Kentucky, while in Washington you can get it for free (that is, paid for by taxpayers) if you get a doctor's note.
2. The federal government still has most of it's regulatory bodies, such as the EPA and FDA. Roads are still maintained, by and large, by the government. Military and legal systems are unchanged. Basically the only significant reduction in government spending is on Social Security and other public-welfare programs. That means old people will be left to die of starvation if they don't have family or friends to take care of them, but since they aren't economically productive I guess it shouldn't matter to libertarians. You're obviously around 15, so for you it makes sense to not have to pay into Social Security when you enter the workforce ten years from now.
That's about all I could get from your incoherent post. It's the typical point of view for a teenager: you don't want to pay for anything that doesn't directly benefit yourself. Then why should the government exist at all? Of course, you think it shouldn't, but you know that nobody will take you seriously as an anarchist. Try developing your viewpoint a little more, give some consideration to how such a system would affect everyone else, and give it another shot.