>>260
I accept that, the US Fed sucks. This does not mean central banking sucks though, and that is my point.
Two words, economy of scale. The chinese through their massive central government can focus more people and resource than any other country in the fucking world. If theres a million people living where there will be water when the three gorges damm is finished, fuck'em! Just send them somewhere else with little or no compensation since the government owns everything anyway! This is of course impossible in both India and Japan. There are currently being built three gigantic export product centres, areas large as fucking central europe each dedicated to one branch of products coupled with huge R&D facilities. Economy of fucking scale, theres your your explaination more than anything else. Okay, thats simple too, but at least it incorporates contemporary economic theory generally accepted by academia.
Whatever about the crime thingy, i dont now how regulated that sector is, yet i dont think freelancers are allowed as long as they dont cut in to the earnings of the big players, if they do they eitehr pay tribute or sleep with the fishes. And thats regulated enough for me.
The reasons why i hate libertarianism and libertarians are many fold. The people i hate because of their arrogance and retarded way of debating, like reinventing definitions so shit gets confused fast (eg capitalism and socialism). And their assertion that libertarianism is a science, yet never can answer why its a science, and how it fucking works (read this thread from the beginning and youl find multiple examples of this)! They also assume that the US failures must mean a global failure, they never assume that other countries can actually succeed where their own government has failed. They love huge strawmen. The ideology i dont know that much about, yet how great can it be if its followers are so retarded that they cant even answer the most basic of questions? But illuminate me please, why is libertarianism infallible?