>>153
"No, you are not listening. What you said is that if the soviet union had been libertarian all they would have had were guerillas and that would have stopped the nazis as effectevily as the red army."
I'm not listenning when you tell me what I said? What?
So you dismiss the fact that weapons are more widely available under libertarianism because you think we are all goateed coffee house types like marxist intellectuals? The russian guerillas weren't fighting for Stalin. Even Stalin knew this, his propoganda was almost entirely aimed at defending mother Russia not the state. Libertarianism is a philosophy that would have cut closer to home, when libertarianism is about protecting freedom and national self determination, this coupled widespread weapons would make the conscript army and the guerillas much more well equipped and determinned. Also bear in mind a libertarian governmetn would be on more friendly terms with the US.