Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Liberals and Libertarians.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 8:45 ID:5849I8oB

There was one thread named "libertarians are a joke" with some liberals talking as though all libertarians are capitalists and libertarians pointing out that this was wrong.

Then there was another thread named "what does socialism mean" with some libertarians talking as though all liberals are communists and some liberals pointing out that this was wrong.

We should be beginning to see a pattern here.

Are we all in agreement that Marx's idea of communism and capitalism are all naive bullshit? I'm not just talking about Marx either, I'm talking about all sorts of political philosophers who knew very little about the field they discussed and viewed the world through a very narrow lense. Marx discussed socio-economics yet he did not major in mathematics which is fundamental to any subject dealing with economics. In his writings he did not prove scientifically that his theories were viable. He was a total failure. No one can take him seriously as a scientist, only as a case study in psychology investigating how people get drawn into fallacies.

So Libertarians believe communism is utter BS and claim not to be capitalists but free marketeers. Whilst liberals believe capitalism is utter BS and claim not to be communists but social democrats....

Perhaps it is time for libertarians to state clearly that capitalism is BS and for liberals to state clearly that communism is BS.

Then we can all agree that Marx and other idealists who followed suite, including national socialists, capitalists and fascists, were bullshitters and we need to do things scientifically.

As a libertarian myself I hereby clearly state that capitalism is BS.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 5:21 ID:n93yqxKI

Excuse me, let me begin by pointing out that you are a complete moron and utterly miss the point.  The consequences of your allegations are exceedingly apparent even to the most casual observer of moderate intelligence.  The fact of the matter is that you are arguing with imprecise definitions and faulty logic.  You in turn create a man of straw out of your opposition, that is, falsely identify your opponents primary position and proceed to burn it to the ground.  This is most likely a result of an extreme inferiority complex on the one side and an duplicit superiority complex on the other.  Dawgs, let's just get along.  I mean, come on...

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List