It's the 21st century version of laissez-faire. Instead of the government raping our asses, it's the corporations. I'd rather have some form of regulation in capitalism than none. Notice how the areas that resembles libertarianism politics the most are the areas that are leeching federal money and relies heavily on manufacturing jobs. Way to take care of your population.
"You is writing bullisht."
It's you ARE writing bullshit. Learn some syntactic rules.
How am I a stupid newbie? I substantiate my claims? I engage in discussion? Yeah, these are pretty noob behaviors on a politics board you know that? I mean... Who discusses things and substantiates claims these days in political discussions? Yeah.
Don't like Communism? Don't like Socialism? That's great. I'm all for your opinion... but if you don't substantiate why these systems are inadequate you're a capable person capable of coming up with substantive reasons. I'd like to hear those reasons, there is a lot of them, for instance communism's practicality, yes I've heard it 1000 times before just as you've heard my rhetoric a 1000 times before. But at least that offers an objection and not ad hominem attacks you seem ever fond of, you mentally destitute abortion of a human.
Oh what am I kidding? You're probably in High School and cannot conjure -- no even fathom -- even the simplest of justifications based in logic as to why you believe whatever shit-brained ideology you believe in is gospel. You just call others noobs. I've seen this before -- it was on a server of a video game -- called Counter-Strike. It was full of pretentious teenagers such as yourself.
Get bent.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-13 17:15 ID:VUW2+J1h
>>161
>"You is writing bullisht."
>It's you ARE writing bullshit. Learn some syntactic rules.
Whoops, you lost the game.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-13 17:16 ID:ekuGjUDL
Guys, guys! Come on now. You can both march your sorry asses over to /y/ pretty soon.
Yeah, how thoughtful and substantiated your thoughts are. They're considered so carefully and so delicately. You're the bad ass of politics you know that? You're brimming with intellectual capacity, why, you're a political savant aren't you? You fuck up grammar, and you contribute nothing to the discussion. You insist your grammar is correct without accounting for tense and plurals. You're a regular trainwreck who was beset by the realization you cannot justify or substantiate claims in a clear and concise manner, instead you cannot, so you act as though you've done something of merit, although you have not.
The laissez faire economy of the United States in the early 20th century made America the most powerful nation in the world. Also, the unregulated US economy had better wages and working conditions than the unionized UK economy.
>>187
US was not the most powerful nation until after WWII. And not undisputedly so until the fall of the USSR.
And it was the good old tide of blood and steel that brought this to pass, not laissez faire.
Your trolling is weak and transparent.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-15 12:41 ID:61U7vsuB
Yeah, steel. Allowed to prosper not because of strict regulation. Imagine instead of the railroads of the gilded age we had Amtrak. Still a world power? unlikely.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-15 14:46 ID:0msKDvQN
Because, as we know, every industry must be heavily regulated if we aren't living in lol libertarian paradise.
Besides, the US was almost destined to be a superpower as long as the society remained stable. It sits on a huge isolated continent filled with resources and a decent climate.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-15 16:12 ID:61U7vsuB
How's Amtrak doing? They are great government success story, right?
it's toy trains in a rectum in love with insertions
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-15 19:00 ID:C3LhpwAv
Part of me hopes the lolertarians somehow gain power and implement their laissez-faire 'utopia' just so I can laugh in their faces when they're starving to death after they cause Great Depression II.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-15 19:44 ID:61U7vsuB
the libertarians wouldn't starve to death, fool. we are the rich ones, the poor liberal suckling on the nanny state would die.
Anyway,libertarianism will never be in power because no one will elect a libertarian. Who would vote for someone who would take away benefits.
You don't know what you have till it's gone. I cannot wait for some Libertardian utopia to spring up, just so the workers can overthrow your asses faster than you could say revolution.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-15 20:36 ID:vr7HhVTl
>>198
The workers would finally be able to own property instead of having to hand it over to the state, would no longer need you to beg for it to be given back to them and I would be laughing ass off in the office of a succesful business providing high paid sophisticated jobs and education to 100s of your ex-followers.
ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE ECONOMIC POWER TO THE PEOPLE
WOOOYAH!!!
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-15 23:49 ID:D5Awj9Jn
>>199
instead of the government fucking people over, corporations would be fucking people over! Great idea!