Election

Ok /newpol/ consider this hypothetical election:

Candidate A:
Associates with ward heelers and consults with astrologists. He's had two mistresses. He chain smokes and drinks 8 to 10 martinis a day.

Candidate B:
Was kicked out of office twice, sleeps until noon, used opium in college, and drinks a quart of brandy every evening.

Candidate C:
Is a decorated war hero. He's a vegetarian, doesn't smoke, drinks an occasional beer and hasn't had any illicit affairs.

Which of these candidates is your choice?

Am I the only person who considers potential leaders by their past record on handling public affairs? I don't care about the rest.

They could be high on crack all day and spend all night at the local brothel, provided they actually get the job done while in office.