Liberals who call everyone racist.

What do you think of liberals who just go around calling people racist, even other liberals.

you have no rational arguement. all you have is a conviction that the us is always wrong.

OMG RACIST

oops!

I will present the same as i presented in the Lounge; everyone is racist to a degree. sexism, racism, ageism... all are a product of society that all are guilty of. no one is above it.

to point out an obvious flaw gets you no where. all you can do is make an example out of yourself and continue to not condone the act of any of these 'ism's and simply put a good judgement out there

no point in whining about something that will only be changed through action...

DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT

oh yes, and it isn't just liberals who put the obvious out there. we just tell you what you should have already known but choose to ignore ^..^

Wo0t @ [LIBERALISM]

>>44
Everyone's guilty except the judge? amirite?

meaning what? i know that i have my tendencies to blame whatever group is not present at the time of my anger

however, i can say with pride that it varies. i am an equal opportunity hater; i hate everyone

>>46
Meaning if you are the one doing the judging you are exempt from criticism. Amirite?

oh definately. i have had to sit there and listen to people [DEFEND] their racist ways, as if they were fine...

but, life has shown that everyone is wrong except for the one telling you such

i am hoping that one day society will [AWAKEN] and realize that everyone is faulty...

>>48
It's just that some have allot more then others.

>>48
That happenned 100s of years ago. Every religion claims that no one is free from sin or perfect. Liberals go around calling everyone racist because they think if they are the ones doing the accusing then they cannot possibly be held to blame for anything.

>>50
Liberals = Ted Haggard

>>41
You have no rational counter argument. All you have is a conviction that the US is always right, and that the president never lies.

>>52
>>41
You have no rational retorts. All you have is a conviction that the US is either always right or always wrong, when in fact the US is right about some things and wrong about others.

I can live with that.

But i could be wrong

Said liberals are racist, duh. Racism is there when you heavily acknowledge race. This is really easy to see.

F.Y.S.

>>56
Truth. There are people who only care about race because of the effects of racism. Then there are people who are stupid enough to blur the distinction and now believe that this is a racial issue, they are called liberals.

Liberals think they decide who is racist and who isn't, when in fact it is defined by logic. They see themselves as medieval inquisitors seeking out heresy in the flock and declaring that anyone who criticises them is a witch/racist using paranoia and fear instead of logic to convince people.

http://stuff.co.nz/3992562a16076.html

>>59
hahaha wow what?

Liberals are racists

Conservatives are also racist

NEWS AT 11

>>59

How does I strawman?

OP is a racist.

also,
>>2
>>3
>>4
>>5
.
.
.
>>64
>>65 GET is a racist too

fuck niggers, whitey, yellow-fucking-japs, yellow-fucking-chinks, and everyone else.  MAKE ROOM FOR THE CLEAR MAN!

^Failure

Its supposed to be "FUCK NIGGERS".

>>1
What do you think of liberals who just go around calling people racist, even other liberals.

If it pisses you of, I'm all for it.

racism is okay. NIGGERS ARE COOL BUT SHIT NIGGERS GO DIE IN A FIERY PIT OF PLASMA ROBOTS

>>28
>>29

The qualifier in >>20 is that the poster stated that their facts are based on PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. Likewise, the facts backing your arguments are also derived from PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. By stating that >>20 is wrong because your personal experience states otherwise makes absolutely no sense.

From my PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, discussing immigration with liberals has only led to relatively normal political debate regarding the economic impact, not values/morals arguments involving prejudice and racism.

Assuming you even have any personal experience discussing such subjects with liberals, much less (true) conservatives, your experiences may confirm or contradict mine, yet when it comes down to it, it's still just your own PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

Bottom line, your personal experiences carry no more or less weight in an argument than mine or the poster you are trying to discredit (assuming you're not a diplomat or someone who deals in political discourse for a living, but since this is anonymous and 4chan, people can be anything they want to be).

As long as 4chan is anonymous, where anybody can say whatever they want without having to worry about personal repercussions physically/academically/etc., everybody's a political intellectual, and everybody speaks as if they are right and everybody else is wrong.

I don't take anything posted here seriously unless they back up their claims with facts (REAL FACTS, that you can confirm, not "from my experience" or "liberals/conservatives I know"). And even then, you should "trust, but verify" (ironically, a Reagan quote that not many of his fans seemed to have taken to heart). As far as I am concerned, on this board, both sides are wrong.

>>69
So where can I find liberals who discuss issues like mass immigration in a mature manner?

>>70
Wrong. In some instances liberals do discuss things maturely and there are some liberals who feel threatenned by criticism and call everyone racist in an attempt to ignore it. Likewise there are assholes in every other political group. However go to any forum on the internets and discuss the fact that races have spent 10000 years or so apart and have evolved different traits or discuss the belief that the entire sum of wealth in the west is not due to technological progress, but slavery that was abolished over 100 years ago, imperialism and colonies and 99/100 you will be called a racist for disagreeing with liberals instead of finding a liberal to engage with in productive rational debate.

>>71
So where can I find conservatives who discuss issues like mass immigration in a mature manner?

It's pretty easy to counter your arguments when you have no proof that can be universally cited and confirmed, only alleged personal experience.

See, as long as people keep believing that their own personal opinons are the only right ones, arguments will end up looking as pointless as this one. You can claim whatever you want, but I don't care as long as you don't give reasonable proof, and neither does anybody else. For every "liberal" you mention that fits your stereotype, I can find a "conservative" to match. Since you give no real factual proof, I don't have to, either.

Besides, everybody knows slavery was only a supplement to the argarian sector of the economy. You are obviously lying, or may or may not have actually been ignorant of this basic fact before making up opinions for these so-called "liberals" you supposedly debate with.

I'd truly like a rational debate, but I can't seem to find one here. If you've noticed, I haven't even taken a side yet, yet your vehement hate for "liberals" (or at least what you believe to be a liberal ideology) has led you not to debate me in my criticism of your procedure for rational discourse, but to namecall and spout more and more stereotypes that you have established in your mind about "liberals."

>>72
I'm not a conservative.

So where can I find liberals who discuss issues like mass immigration in a mature manner?

I hope you don't mind if I ignore the rest of your argument until you stop dodging this question. Since you love defending liberals so much I'm sure you'll answer honestly.

NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNINIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNINIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNINIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNINIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNINIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNINIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER

>>73
I'm not a liberal.

So where can I find conservatives who discuss issues like mass immigration in a mature manner?

I hope you don't mind if I ignore the rest of your argument until you stop dodging this question. Since you love defending conservatives so much I'm sure you'll answer honestly.

Until you come up with a real argument, this is how I will answer you. And it works, since you seem to be unable to do so.

>>75
http://www.spectator.co.uk/

>>75
It wasn't hard for me to answer you, why was it so hard for you to answer me? I will take you childish attitude as proof that you are wrong.

>>75
Oh and when you answer me, even if the website you post in a childish imitation of my answer doesn't even contain liberals who can discuss the issue maturely, I will stop ignoring the rest of >>72.

>>75
Oh and when you answer me, even if the website you post in a childish imitation of my answer doesn't even contain conservatives who can discuss the issue maturely, I will stop ignoring the rest of >>72.

Refusing to even accept criticism to your position means you aren't ready to discuss these issues with rational people.

>>79
If you were following this thread you would realise that I would address his criticism if he answerred a simple question of mine.