Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Liberal Or Conservative..i want a tally

Name: .exe 2007-03-01 20:07 ID:46sBsVpd

personally for me..conservative
libs are for the gay

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-01 20:09 ID:QP2Gtxhl

For me, both. I just couldn't have it any other way.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-01 20:15 ID:zRh2Oxw4

Liberal, conservatives are for the gay in the closet.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 17:59 ID:ylXPkIBd

>>1

because they don't want to force family values on everyone else who is unwilling to live that god-fearing bullshit lifestyle?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 18:58 ID:IK7EC5If

>>4
No, because they want to force cheese stank gay asses into people's faces.

Name: Moi 2007-03-02 20:20 ID:azcVJob0

MOOO MOOO MOOO COMMUNISM LIVES RAH RAH RAH

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 21:56 ID:rj1cepW9

I was a liberal and now I'm a Conservative.

Its simple, ask yourself at the current rate where will western society be in 30-50 years.

Muslims, Jews and Niggers GTFO.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 22:50 ID:/wNGSyI4

Moderate

But I vote Democrat

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 23:28 ID:vNm12tCN

Anarcho-syndicalist

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 0:47 ID:VyTkLoAT

>>7

Why not libertarian?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 0:56 ID:t8vnVttV

If you're not a liberal by the time you turn 18, you don't have a heart.
If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35 you don't have a brain.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 1:04 ID:DNLLuj/4

liberals and conservatives both suck.  if i had to choose, and death was not an option, i'd go con.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 1:51 ID:bMsgJ3a/

>>10
GTFO, libertarian piece of shit. Go move to Iraq where they have a 10% flat tax.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 2:33 ID:+A2dcSim

>>10

Totally different scale than Liberal/Conservative, dipshit

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 2:34 ID:+A2dcSim

Centrist

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 3:00 ID:VyTkLoAT

>>13

Iraq is fascist, not libertarian, conservatard.. there is more than taxes and social programs (or lack of) to a view

>>14

Different scale? I'm not sure on how you sort your political views, but I view it as a compass, not a scale. Libertarianism is socially liberal and fiscally conservative. Top of the compass, right in the center.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 3:26 ID:HIagLJ6k

>>10
um.. Are you sure we want these guys to be the face of the libertarian paty?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 4:02 ID:VyTkLoAT

utterly abject failure@topic

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 4:05 ID:VyTkLoAT

>>17

how/why do you make so many judgments from a simple question? asked why, nothing more, nothing less

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 4:21 ID:TH6scnHi

>>19
"Muslims, Jews and Niggers GTFO."

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 7:29 ID:Xub7Vx9I

>>20
Pretty simple huh? Once you get rid of ""Muslims, Jews and Niggers" you'll get rid of about 75-80% of all the problems in western society. (I'm being srios too)

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 9:26 ID:TH6scnHi

>>21
I don't think it's as high as 75%-80% and you will be creating the problem of stamping on muslim jew and black human rights. Your reasonning is the same as shooting someone and going "I did it because he was more likely to commit crime than a woman and now that he's dead it doesn't matter what happenned, amirite?".

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 21:25 ID:bMsgJ3a/

>Libertarianism is socially liberal and fiscally conservative.

As in, "We don't care about morality, the safety of the people, hell we don't care about shit as long as the rich get to keep all their money."

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 21:50 ID:Fefttc1d

>>21
Your missing the point, getting rid of religion and poverty will get rid of 75-80% of problems, we can't get rid of one them, but the other can be.
>>23
and is there a problem with that?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 22:19 ID:VyTkLoAT

>>23

If you are satisfied with that interpretation, feel free to.. but don't think anyone else is going to sympathize with someone who advocates a government interfering with everything in your life

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 22:48 ID:bLOH51Hh

Socially liberal, somewhat of a moderate fiscally I guess.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 23:58 ID:sP0H3PZF

I don't really take an opinion on taxes, maybe becauase I don't pay them ;), not for income anyways.

I believe in stiff industry regulation, no taxes on business(i.e. no sales tax), and just yearly income taxes on individuals. I'm a progressive, I believe in fast, aggressive and most importantly couragous change for the better.

In terms of education, I'm against any formal curriculum. I promote home-schooling and parents actually caring about their kids.

I also believe in not pissing off other countries, and defending  one's land against those who wish to tell you how to run your country. Such as the United States and it's infamous cold war and Russia's similar atrocities.

I believe in ethics, like treating people with respect, not numbers or sheep.

I have a good blend of rational liberal and conservative ideas. None of which will likely come to fruition, but nevertheless, they're good things to think about and to believe in.

I support the Green party and I support the rapid education of the poor.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 16:39 ID:iF/oEieH

>>25
Still, taking the moral high ground makes you look like shit in comparison.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 17:54 ID:iq/cdI9f

>>28

Nobody cares if you have a good sense on morals these days. Besides, who said living freely is living without morals?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 18:18 ID:fZZB50g/

>>16

No, a libertarian is not defined as socially liberal and fiscally conservative.

A libertarian one end of a scale where the other end is authoritarian.

So, in a question of "are you more liberal or conservative" saying "why not libertarian" is stupid and irrelevant as you can be a liberal libertarian or a conservative libertarian

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 18:29 ID:iq/cdI9f

>>30

I was talking about the XY graph, X being economic freedom (conservatism) and Y being personal freedom (liberalism)

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 20:05 ID:gpTHF8IF

I was talking about roses and beer.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 20:30 ID:iq/cdI9f

o

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 20:39 ID:JNMqS4UJ

>>30
No, there is actually nothing wrong with asking that question.  Yes, you can be a liberal libertarian or a conservative libertarian, but you can also be just plain 'libertarian.' 

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 20:54 ID:fZZB50g/

>>34

what the fuck are you talking about

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 21:01 ID:59Y1MVV7

what's a liberal libertarian and what's conservative libertarian?
isn't the point of libertarianism that the liberals are not going far enough and the conservatives are authoritarian?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 23:42 ID:F7UkLQC3

>>27
Those are some good policies you have there.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-05 8:39 ID:XRI2rTs3

Neither, one anarco-syndicalist please (but liberal on social issues, legalizing of all drugs, homosexual marriage, etc) also for the environment and regulation.

>>9 Welcome brother!

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-05 9:42 ID:5G93+4e+

Neither, another neo-marxist who cannot think beyond one ridiculous abstract medium please (but liberal on social issues, legalizing of all drugs, homosexual marriage, etc) also for the environment and regulation.

>>9 Welcome comrade!*

fix'd

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-05 17:43 ID:ohWuqT51

>>36

Libertarians believe that they are the absolute owner of their own life, not the government and not anybody else. That's the basic most simple definition of the term. Not Libertarian holds the same belief outside of that definition

Liberal Libertarians hold the same belief but take leftist stances on more social issues such as immigration and foreign policy.

Conservative Libertarians are the opposite.

My point from the beginning was that it's not a 1 demonsional scale. You can't just say "Oh, i'm a libertarian" which is on the Y axis when asked whether you are liberal or conservative (where you are on the X axis). It doesn't answer the question.


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List