>>84
Yes. I meant: "All democracy is divisional, i cant vote in american elections and you cant vote in swedish elections." Sorry, must've been drunk when i wrote that. But i understand now what you mean. In any case, do you you agree that council communism at least in theory is democratic, and that therefore communism is not an opposite of democracy?
"Auschwitz doesn't compare to the worst even China has to offer let alone Abu Ghraib."
I never said it did. What i meant was that you seemed to imply that abu ghraib was not a problem since china had several abu ghraibs and i tried to prove the absurdity of such a claim by st ating that one auschwitz is bad enough, regardless of why it is in existence.
And btw, there at least has been children incarcerated in both abu ghraib and guantanamo and god knows about the rest of the camps.
"I still think my original reason for not paying [Marx] any attention is sound."
He argues for the view of how the liberty as proposed by the liberals of his time was empty of any social changing potential. I haven't read those arguments so i cant say how good they are, but i can at least say that it is founded on more than just hatred towards some ideology. But i can at least agree in principle that any ideology that is liked by the ruling class is something the working class should be highly suspicious about.
And, if Darwin would have thought that white men were inferior to native Americans, would that mean that there were no use in reading "On the Origin of Species"? And should one not read about Jean-Baptiste Lamarcks theories because they have been proven wrong?
"What political ideology would that be?"
Anti-Communism. Popular in the US and among far right wingers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Communism