>>111
but you were mxiign things up in your post, first stating how no tyranny would happen under libertarianism, and then how it is happening under communism. Which of course is true since one is theoretical and the other is attempted to be practiced. Then you say i'm a retard for pointing out that it would be possible to have a sort of tyranny under libertarianism? you should just relax a bit, if you don't like people adding to/correcting what you write, maybe you should be a bit more clear and specific.
ps. i'm not a communist.