>>18
First of all the accusation of racism is unfounded because even if you think they are wrong they still had a basis and enough to be concerned about. Therefore there is nothing to suggest anyone here has been racist and you must be accusing them of being racist irresponsibly.
Secondly, all 5 points are valid crushing arguments which prove conclusively Barack is not the best option for president. The facts of which can easily be found, I'm not going to be your nanny though and google this all for you. Do it yourself.
1: He wants to tighten restrictions.
2: All he does is criticise. Every president risked his reputation on several
3: Race isn't an issue, but racism is an issue. He needs to give an assurance that he is mature enough to distinguish between these two seperate issues.
4: Baraks has done nothing to conflict with his own party which is seriously flawed. Either he doesn't have the balls to stop being a pupper or he is an idiot. Here is a list of facts I spent 3 hours compiling for you on the issue.
www.google.com
5: This is a democracy not a technocracy. I'm not going to fork out $5 and spend 90 minutes reading some democrat garble and god knows how long maticulously criticising and looking for answers for each and every flaw I come across. Let's do this one issue at a time. Why is Barack supporting mercantilist policies? Doesn't he realise the loss in economic efficiency costs the country as a whole? If he cares about stealing from the rich and giving to the poor why is he wasting the economy of the country to support corrupt outdated cottage industries?