>>74
I'm not putting words in your mouth, I'm taking the words you use and applying them to other crimes to show how what you say is biased and contradictory.
Yeah, but here the thing:
I don't support circumcision or uncircumcision, either way. This is what your puny little brain simply can not grasp because it torpedos any attempt you have at using circular reasoning (comparing child molestation to circumcision) to validate your weak argument. There can be no 'Bias' or contradictions here when I don't even have a perference.
All I'm saying is that if a parent wants to do that to their kid for cultural or for the
supposed medical reasons, then that's well within their rights. Just like it's well within the rights of parents to NOT circumcise their child for cultural or supposed medical reasons.
The reason I think this is because both sides have failed to provide unrefutable and conclusive evidence that infant circumcision (or lack there of) makes a major difference in the lives of Adult Males.
>>76, >>77, >>78, >>79 - It doesn't matter if you're the same person or a group of nomadic retards, all you have to do to end this argument once and for all is to provide valid, peer-reviewed, conclusive evidence that infantile circumcision negatively effects Adult males and this would be over and DONE.
But you've been unable to do that (probably because no such study exists) and you've basically been repeating yourself for the last 30 or so posts.
Face it: Without the above criteria, you lose (and fail).
Next thread, please.