>>71
Delusional and Wrong. Removing a whole ear would most definately causes damage to the middle and outer ear qualifying as conductive hearing loss. Maybe you need to look in the physiologyof things before you open your big mouth.
>>72
No, Mr. Same Person, I'm saying that as long as there isn't any conclusive evidence that a procedure will harm a child (who have no consent regardless of the medical procedure), then this doesn't constitute as "harm" in the first fucking place.
You have shown absolutely no conclusive scientific evidence that would put circumcision on par with molestation or rape (where's the long term psychological and emotion dysfunction?), so I don't know why you keep trying make these retarded comparisons and put these retarded words into my mouth.
Why would I be for sexual intercourse with a female infant when circumcision doesn't equate to such? Why do you continue to assume that I "support" circumcision when I've repeated multiple times that I could careless either way?