Are you trying to "win"?

With all of your respective ideologies flying around, I've had to ask myself if you're actually trying to "win". Do you have an understanding that we are one human race of people? Is competition really needed when we, as humans, have escaped such things as animalistic instnict with logic and justice?

Do you have ethics or morals that are absolute, or do they only apply to you and yours? I'm not talking about "Let's be one World"- I am merely questioning whether you all feel more fulfilled by treating others negatively for whatever reason or if you'd rather help everyone and anyone you can.

It's not a directive, but a question.

Aum Shantih Shantih Shantih

>>37
That seems a bit biased. Do you have a unbiased source?

>>31
If i remember correctly the republican party was formed to counter threats to white anglosaxon protestants in mid 19th century. These threats were irish catolic immigrants and that the south would export slavery to the north, putting the white protestants out of work. But i think the south wanted to export slavery also, that the north should deregulate its slavemarket.
But i must ask, does all genocide make you angry? And do you believe that all presidents who have for base reasons gone to war have forfitted their life? Because that includes all US presidents since FDR.

>>1 Of course i debate to win. Otherwise it would be masterbation. The point of having an argument is to come to a conclusion, and if the debaters have opposite views then one must yield and one must prevail.