Stop using marxist derived ideologies.

There is an overriding theme throughout them all which invalidates them. I'll give you the core concepts and if you are too stupid/lazy to reason what the overriding themes are, ask a question and I will do the thinking for you and write you a nice explanation.

1: Someone will always have more power over others and use it.

2: Without justice, there is no liberty.

3: Political, social, economic and military systems are essentially methods of directing the limited levels of motivation people have to serve a purpose.

4: Different systems influence to different degrees the amount of motivation directed towards their objective and the efficiency in which followers attempt to fulfil the objective.

5: Certain systems require impossible levels of motivation in order to exceed contemporary systems in efficiency.

6: A system is needed to enforce justice, preserve liberty and eliminate tyranny and thus create the environment needed for systems other than a type of tyranny.


Protip: Before replying, ensure that your reply is not already coverred by any combination of 6 of these points.

>>4
When I said "yes it is", I clearly meant "yes it is valid". You are nitpicking.

My argument is non sequitur if you ignore the strategic value a large population embued with national self determination is in creating and maintaining a libertarian environment. Declaring that every person in this nation has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, the right to bear arms, the right to free speech and representation etc... is a very efficient method of ensuring liberty and has not been surpassed.

The cost of permitting the people to influence the government is lower than permitting injustice and tyranny. Point 6 stands, go right ahead and debate the use of minimum wage and other policies adopted by democratically elected governments, however you will have to abide by the 6 points I have outlined since they are correct and ideologies which ignore one of these points will ultimately result in failure.

Perhaps the police should adopt free market policies to improve the efficiency of it's administration, but it should never be able to decide the legal process, laws, judges and juries.