>>72
"I didn't say most gun owners were criminals, I said most have them to use as weapons against other people, which includes self defense against criminals."
That doesn't mean that a gun's only use or purpose is to kill people. Anyway, I'm still not so sure that's true. There are MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of hunters out there who don't use the gun to kill people. Top those up with all the other sports shooters, and you have quite a sizable sum.
"I don't pick and choose. I'm a libertarian - and I argue against all those things that you listed."
"So you think it should be allowed to yell bomb in a public airport, fire in a public movie theater, or print a detailed article about how to overthrow the US government and terrorize the people in a newspaper? those are speech and press control."
I think speech and press control of any kind should be non-existant on private property. The only exceptions to this rule would be some situation in which fraud or force is directly harming an individual.
"The difference between libertarians and anarchists is anarchists say there should be no laws while Libertarians say that anything that doesn't hurt others should be legal. I think no gun control affects people more negatively that some sensible gun control, in the same way I think about speech or press control."
First of all, I don't see a shred of proof that 'sensible gun control' works. Until you proove as much, you have no case at all. Even in that situation, I still say if you feel unsafe around other people with guns, buy a gun yourself, and get over your irrational gun-phobia.