>>51
You have every negative right. You have no positive rights.
When Libertarians and Republicans talk about the "Right to Keep and Bear Arms", we aren't talking about making sure absolutely everyone can get free guns from a government-regulated system. We mean nobody can take your guns. That's a negative right. It's something nobody should be able to stop you from doing.
When Liberals talk about the "Right to have a home", you aren't trying to protect the institution of home ownership, you're trying to force everyone to pay the rent of a bunch of other people. That is a positive right. It's something that everyone has to take positive action to provide you.
The rights to "Life, Liberty, and Property", are not rights where you are provided with things. It means nobody can kill you. It means nobody can enslave you (subject you to involuntary servitude of any kind). It means nobody can steal your property. It does not mean society owes you life and free healthcare to stay alive. It does not mean society owes you their own useful time. It does not mean that if you lack property, someone somewhere must provide you with property.
Libertarians believe you have every negative right and no positive rights.
There are rights for the starving to have bread, for the homeless to have a home, for the poor to be rich. Anyone who steals the bread of a starving man, prevents a homeless man from buying a house or renting an aparment, or steals property from the poor and prevents them from becoming rich, those people are damned criminals.
But society does not owe you bread just because you are starving, it does not owe you a home because you have none, it does not owe you money because you lack money.
Don't confuse these. Libetarian rights are not arbitrary.