Oftentimes there is the problem in America whereby it is necessary to communicate with recent immigrants who may not know the language very well. The problem with this is not the immigrants, it is the fault with English itself.
So we should simplify English, by reducing the number of words in it. An example, let's get rid of the word "bad", and use the term "ungood" instead. To express something such as very good, use "plusgood." Very bad would be "plusungood." Extremely bad would be "doubleplusungood."
I will call this new language Newspeak. It will faciliate the easy communication of all races.
What do you all think?
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-09 4:16
This idea is tripleplusungood
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-09 4:49
i think we already have something like that. it'sc alled Esperanto
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-09 16:32
lol, but isn't triple too hard for the retards to understand? why not just use three. threeplus good. wow, all superlatives are simply a number + good/bad infront of a word! WHAT A COOL LANGUAGE.
no wait, it's dumb. what if i think something is good in one way and bad in another? that's a threeplusgoodtwominusungood way of doing it!
Now, it's right immigrants are not very good at speaking english when they first come to an english speaking country, but after a while it is possible to understand what they say, even if they say "baddest" or "ungood", it's not correct, but it's understandable, and you don't need to make some sort of mongoloid language just so it'd be supposedly easier for immigrants to learn english. English as it is now is a somehow universal language, mainly because it's easy andbecause of the british colonialism, and because of the huge american export of both products and culture during the 20th century, this has created dialects. You are very welcome to make your own Newspeak dialect, you'll just sound like a retard speaking it.
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-09 17:30
they already tried this, along with simplifying spelling to be more phonetic
obviously it didn't work out
p.s. esperanto is completely different
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-09 17:30
>>2-4
Spoilers: This is the interpretation of the attempt by the totalitarian state envisaged by George Orwell in his book "1984" to corrupt language in order to aid in the control of thought itself. George Orwell believed the elimination of certain words would be considerred an important way to do this by his hyper-totalitarian state.