Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Should CP be legal to *VIEW*

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-06 21:52

What I don't understand is, why is it illegal to merely VIEW images of child pornography? Why does the govenrnmet feel the need to prevent people from seeing something that has already occured, as if hiding it from view will change the fact that it has happened? Banning pictures of the holocaust won't change the fact that it happened.

Is it because it depicts an act that is illegal? We see illegal acts being committed all the time. Hell, we even have television programs dedicated to watching real video of illegal acts being committed. I can freely go online and watch videos of real robberies, thefts, carjackings, beatings, even murders and assassinations. BUT WAIT! That girl looks a little TOO sexy! Lock the fucker in prison!

Is it because it could encourage deviant behavior? There's nothing to stop murderers from going on to Rotten or Ogrish to download all kinds of grisly scenes of murder and death and getting off to that. Does the government think that banning possession of murder and crime scene photos will prevent murders from occuring? Apparently they are not that stupid. Why, then, the double standard? Because there are children involved? Again, I could go over to Rotten or Ogrish and download pictures of dead and mutilated children all day long. Nothing wrong with that, huh?

Is it because they think the only reason that child pornography is produced is because there is a demand for it? Yeah fucking right. That's like saying that if there was no longer a demand for art, all artists in the world would stop painting, all composers would stop making music, all writers would stop writing. It doesn't work that way. No I am not directly comparing child pornography to the fine arts, but the situation is the same.

I suppose what it can finally come down to is not wanting to give pedophiles the satisfaction. Everyone hates pedos, right? But everyone hates the KKK and ELF and the God Hates Fags people, and they're still allowed to think and believe whatever they want, as long as they don't act out violently. How is fapping to an image an act that affects anyone other than the one fapping? It is a victimless "crime," much like enjoying certain drugs in the privacy of one's own home.

I am no more in support of the production of child pornography than I am of the commiting of any other violent crime. But I am against censorship of any kind. Not letting one watch a video of JFK getting assassinated isn't going to change the fact that his fucking brains were blown out, just like not letting one see a picture of Vicky isn't going to change the fact that she took it in the pooper.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-09 19:27

Im pretty sure its illegal to posses, the logic being that the material is made with the sexual abuse of children,who even if the said material does not appear to be "abusive" that the child or children involved do not have a sufficient understanding of the concept of what they are doing to provide consent and the resulting psychological damage and warping can fall under the definition of harm,(at this point argueing that many parenting methods in the US and religions also psychologically harm children but are legal , in the defense of CP , would be a sad arguement to make, and come off as a somewhat immature "yeah but.." sort of arguement)
and that the exchange, buying or selling of such material supports such activities/and market and/or the illegal trade of children in the asian child sex slave market etc.

interesting and somewhat related sordid fact; a large majority of missing children in the US are kidnapped and sold into the sex slave industry in asia.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List