>>42
"Health care shouldn't be fucking expensive, if the government was in charge of it then it would be free or very cheap"
There is no such thing as a free lunch. If the government did health care, someone, somewhere along the line, would be paying for something that they would not be recieving. They would be forced to work, and then be taxed to pay for services for another person. Again, there is no such thing as a free lunch, and likewise, there is no such thing as 'free' healthcare. It might be 'free' to you, but without a doubt, someone is going to be picking up your bill for you, and they won't have a choice in the matter.
You say 'health care shouldn't be expensive'. Have you considered all the activities the government has done and does that raise the cost of health care? I somehow doubt this. You submit to the knee-jerk reaction of the socialist/fascist democratic party: 'zomg, high health care costs = market failure, lolz'.
The government has many activities, rules, and general regulations that raise the cost of health care unnecessarilly, and have enormous costs both in terms of economics, and in terms of precious human lives.
Until I see at the very least modest attempts at fixing the damage done to the market by government intervention and regulation, I can't say I have a drop of respect for those who wish to socialize health care.
Rather than lowering the costs, and addressing the root of the high expenditures, the socialists advocate a system of simply pushing the bill on to someone else.
Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it. ~George Bernard Shaw