I was kindof shocked when I read this at how true it was. Why does society ignore sexist comments against men, while viciously attacking sexist comments against women?
>>40
no, Big Chauvinist Joe is the n00b who needs to gtfo.
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-28 22:31
>>29
There've been studies done over the years that show, on average, women talk about THREE TIMES as much as men. There's a new book out that goes over these studies and provides insight into the differences between male and female brains, but I can't remember what it's called (and I just heard about it again a few hours ago too...).
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-29 11:48
>>41
Read my post, idiot. I clearly indicated both should gtfo. You should gtfo as well for taking us off topic.
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-29 14:36
wait. i should gtfo!
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-29 21:24
how do i gtfo?
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-29 23:32
That's right. I don't think women are people at all. In fact, I think we should pack them all up and send them to space. While we're at it, why don't we do the same thing to all the liberals and blacks and jews and left-handed people. And people without jobs. And homeless. And anybody who's ever had a parking ticket. And anybody who's ever done drugs. And smokers. And people with small penises. And people who don't devote every second of every day to prayer. Oh, and all the animals too - cuz they're not people either. That's right, anybody who isn't EXACTLY like me needs to die and that's all there is to it.
So all of you fucks can die. Every last one of you. Everybody who agrees with me and disagrees with me.
Did I that a whole bunch of you people have serious chemical deficiencies that you might want to have checked out? Just for your reference.
Oh and, and good luck ever getting a girlfriend. Dumbasses.
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-29 23:52
There is no god, there is no hell, lets establish that. also men are supperior. its a simple fact. physically and mentally. There's a fucking reason we're valued more in society. We are better than you. You will NEVER be equal. also i agree with >>29
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 2:33
bros before hos!
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 3:44
46 - You're joking, right?
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 5:53
I agree with 46
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 6:11
The need for men to emphasis that they are better than women goes to show just at how insecure they really are. It's insulting to men and it holds little regard for them, it makes them appear weak.
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 6:29
oh yeah well
*rips shirt hogan style*
>:)
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 12:23
Look its nature, men are leaders women are fallowers. Just look at the facts in general men have a higher IQ and a much stronger.
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 12:55
Jacquelina just GTFO do you honistly think anyone will listen to you YOUR ON FUCKING 4CHAN
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 13:01
Feminism is bull shit, A woman can sit and declair death to all men, But as soon as a man calls her a crazy bitch hes a sexist and is discriminated against, you dont like men what ever, keep in mind it is your place in nature to dominated by them (thats why your sex organs are ment to take not give)
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-30 16:05
I'm all for advancing the cause of women; their rights, opportunity and place in society. However, I offer a caveat for those thinking the obvious might actually be the right answer. God, as they say, is in the details.
Can any group as large and diverse as American Womanhood actually have a large common set of goals for public policy? The same could be said for men, or people of color, or of any particular ethnic group. Dealing in generalities generally gets one in trouble.
Maybe I'm off base here, but I'm willing to place a bet on this: what most female voters want is not so much what is good for women as what is good for the country. Good policy is good policy; regardless of one's sex, age, faith, education, etc.
Policies that remove barriers, create opportunity, encourage diversity, reward merit and redress past mistakes are good for all people - not just one group or segment of voters. For example, enlightened policies concerning daycare are not exclusively women's issues - it's in everybody's interest to see our nation's children get what they need. We haven't a person to waste and need to invest all we can afford in our future.
Pay equity is good for all - not just for some. As someone who works in a career field dominated by women, I know that jobs traditionally staffed by women are underpaid. A re-evaluation of pay for equity will raise my pay as well. My example may sound self serving, but I would be for it even if my job were a different one. Right is right, and we should always stand with and for those getting the short end of the stick.
What I guess I'm saying is that if we stand for traditional progressive values, instead of just giving them lip service, and act as we advocate, our cause will be supported by the majority of people - not just women. Actions speak louder than words and the advent of Speaker Pelosi speaks louder than a thousand round tables, conferences or position papers ever could.
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-01 12:08
>>46 Here. Yes, I was kidding - sarcasm was dripping from that post.
Any of you morons who were agreeing with the bashing that was done in my post are dumber than I thought possible. Like I said, good luck ever getting a girlfriend, let alone sex, without paying for one. Prison sex doesn't count.
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-02 0:39
Nancy Pelosi seems like a bitch. Why couldn't we get a dem more like Jon Tester or Howard Dean?
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-02 11:26
Those bitches?
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-04 16:18
Nancy Pelosi is making history. We should be glad that we finally have the first female speaker of the house
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-04 21:28
>>60
Should we? When someone is forced to eat a shit sandwich should they be glad they are making history?
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-04 23:51
>>60 So it doesn't matter that she's a stupid bitch? SHE'S A WOMAN SO WE SHOULD SUPPORT HER WHETHER SHE SUX OR NOT, LoLZ!
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-05 11:33
Sigh!
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-05 13:56
>>62 She's better than Hillary. Who says she's a stupid bitch?
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-05 16:08
>>64
I'll agree she's better than Hillary, but so what? Hillary is a bitch too. So one is slightly less of a bitch than the other, who gives a shit? I have no problem with having a female speaker of the house, just as long as she isn't a bitch. I overheard a bunch of feminists talking about how wonderful it is now that we have a female speaker of the house, saying it was about time. They didn't say a THING about why they agreed with Nancy Pelosi as speaker, or why they thought she was the best candidate, other than the fact that she was a woman...
Honestly, does gender really matter? I'm going to support whoever I think is the best candidate, regardless of what gender they are.
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-05 18:59
>>65 Politics is all about bitching. And I agree with you.
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-05 19:02
Woman tend to use emotion when they make a decision, and Men tend to use logic when they make a decision.
Therefore Women should not run for any government job.
>>67 That's just a bunch of hooplah to me. No one is a slave to their emotions. We all have free will. What you have just said is moot and really just a bunch of bullshit, not to mention very stereotypical.
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-07 1:57
>>69
Wrong, the only reason why it is hooplah is because it does not apply to Margaret Thatcher.
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-07 3:29
/r/ Margaret Thatcher pr0n
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-07 5:46
all woman politicians are bitches
but then again, all MAN politicians are bullies and assholes