>>30
That's because your argument is pure bunk.
Facts are facts, fiction is fiction, regardless of the source. Got it? If a compulsive liar told me that air is composed of 21% oxygen, does that make it not so?
Instead of refuting the above linked articles, you come up with a ridiculous red herring that wouldn't fool a child. That's because your claims are probably bunk (why aren't you proving it?), and your posturing ("thousands of articles on global warming over the past 15 years" = 133 articles a year! lollers) bullshit.
Who do you think you're kidding? You're just a teenage troll without a clue. You can't disprove the above articles, so you keep coming up with excuses so you don't have to.